Clinico–pathological phenotypes of systemic sclerosis–associated myopathy: analysis of a large multicentre cohort
Ana Matas-García, Alfredo Guillén-Del-Castillo, Boris Kisluk, Albert Selva-O’Callaghan, Gerard Espinosa, Sergio Prieto‐González, Pedro Moreno, Glòria Garrabou, Josep M. Grau‐Junyent, Carmen Pilar Simeón‐Aznar, José C. Milisenda
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyse the clinico-serological and histological phenotypes of patients with SSc with associated myopathy. METHODS: From November 2002 to September 2020, 52 patients with SSc underwent a muscle biopsy for suspected myopathy. We established two subgroups according to the histological findings based on the presence of isolated fibrosis or fibrosis together with significant inflammation. These patterns were designated as fibrosing and inflammatory, respectively. Clinical data, antibody profile, electrophysiologic studies, muscle biopsy findings and data regarding treatment, mortality and survival were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Fourteen biopsies had a fibrosing pattern, whereas 26 showed an inflammatory pattern that could be classified (according to the predominant pattern) into DM (n = 7), necrotizing myopathy (n = 4) and non-specific myositis (n = 15). Additionally, 12 muscle biopsies were reported as neurogenic atrophy (n = 2), or normal muscle or minimal changes (n = 10). Compared with the inflammatory group, SSc patients with the fibrosing pattern presented a higher prevalence of ischaemic heart disease (38.5% vs 3.8%, P = 0.011), conduction abnormalities or arrhythmias (61.5% vs 26.9%, P = 0.036), anti-topo I antibodies (42.9% vs 11.5%, P = 0.044), greater median ESR (53.5 mm/h vs 32.5 mm/h, P = 0.013), with poor response to treatment and a higher mortality (42.9% vs 3.8%, P = 0.004) and lower cumulative survival (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SSc-associated myopathy require a comprehensive approach that encompasses clinical, serological and histopathological aspects, given their outcome predictive capacity. At least two different phenotypes can be drawn, considering clinico-pathological features. Significant differences are delineated between both a fibrotic and an inflammatory phenotype.