Catalytic Asymmetric Addition and Telomerization of Butadiene with Enamine Intermediates
Yaning Wang, Jie Zhang, Chang You, Xueling Mi, Sanzhong Luo
Abstract
Open AccessCCS ChemistryCOMMUNICATION14 Jul 2022Catalytic Asymmetric Addition and Telomerization of Butadiene with Enamine Intermediates Yaning Wang, Jie Zhang, Chang You, Xueling Mi and Sanzhong Luo Yaning Wang Key Laboratory for Molecular Recognition and Function, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190 School of Chemical Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190 , Jie Zhang College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875 , Chang You Center of Basic Molecular Science (CBMS), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084 , Xueling Mi *Corresponding authors: E-mail Address: [email protected] E-mail Address: [email protected] College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875 and Sanzhong Luo *Corresponding authors: E-mail Address: [email protected] E-mail Address: [email protected] Center of Basic Molecular Science (CBMS), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084 https://doi.org/10.31635/ccschem.021.202101240 SectionsSupplemental MaterialAboutAbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Herein, we report tunable asymmetric addition and telomerization of butadiene by synergistic chiral primary amine/achiral palladium catalysis. A selection of different achiral phosphine ligand in concert with the chiral primary amine-trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TfOH) conjugates enables both chemo- and enantioselective control of the coupling with butadiene. Bidentate [(oxydi-2,1-phenylene)-bis-(diphenylphosphine)] (DPEPhos) ligand led to 1,4-addition adduct whereas monodentate (p-Tol)3P ligand gave the telomerization product. A range of α-branched β-ketoesters and aldehydes could be applied to afford allylation or telomerization products bearing all-carbon quaternary centers at high efficiency and good chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivities. Download figure Download PowerPoint Introduction The stereoselective construction of C–C bonds is an enduring theme in synthetic organic chemistry.1–31 As an industrial platform chemical with an annual production of ca. 1.3 × 107 tons, butadiene appears as an ideal starting material for chemical synthesis in the pursuit of atom-economic value-added production.32,33 To this end, transition-metal catalysts have been explored and carefully tuned to enable selective C–C bond formation reactions of butadiene while suppressing undesired polymeric pathways.34–51 It is known that butadiene can participate in crotylation,34–40 1,2- or 1,4-addition,41–43 and telomerization41–44 (Scheme 1a). In these reactions, chemoselectivity control has always been an issue and delicate yet judicious selection of ligands and fine-tuning of the additives are normally required. Besides the challenges on chemoselective control, the development of asymmetric catalysis has also been frequently explored, but progress along this line is rather limited. Successful examples are only reported for crotylation by the groups of Krische and Buchwald.38–40 Asymmetric addition and telomerization with butadiene remains largely underdeveloped (Scheme 1a). Scheme 1 | (a and b) Catalytic asymmetric C–C bond formation with butadiene. Download figure Download PowerPoint Mechanistically, the addition to butadiene proceeds via M–H to form a metal-π-allyl intermediate, and the telomerization occurs through oxidative cyclization to form a bis-π-allylpalladium intermediate (Scheme 1).41–51 The addition of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds to 1,3-dienes has been known since 1970s with the work of Hata et al.41,42 However, the reactions yielded mixtures of 1,2-/1,4-addition and telomerization adducts.42 In 2004, Hartwig et al.52 first reported Pd-catalytic asymmetric intermolecular additions of β-diketones to cyclohexadiene and 2,3-dimethylbutadiene with moderate enantioselectivity. Very recently, Zhou et al.53 and Malcolmson et al.54 independently demonstrated asymmetric addition to substituted 1,3-butadiene with Meldrum's acid derivatives and activated C-pronucleophiles, respectively (Scheme 1a). However, the extension of these catalytic systems to 1,3-butadiene has not been achieved. On the other hand, although the telomerization of butadiene has been developed in academic and industrial research for over 50 years,45–47 a catalytic enantioselective version remains underdeveloped. All the examined chiral metal catalysis gave unsatisfactory enantioselectivities (<50% ee) (Scheme 1a).55–59 Herein, we report chiral primary amine/palladium synergistic catalysis for asymmetric C–C bond formation reactions of 1,3-butadiene via enamine intermediates (Scheme 1b). The dual catalysis not only allows for chemoselective tuning between addition and telomerization pathways by simple ligand switch but also enables high enantioselective control for both processes. The reactions could be applied to α-branched aldehydes and β-ketoesters, leading to the formation of acyclic all-carbon quaternary stereocenters with high efficiency and excellent chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivities. Results and Discussion Based on our initial successes on achiral palladium/chiral primary amine catalysis,60–63 we began by examining the coupling of tert-butyl 2-methyl-3-oxobutanoate 2a and 1,3-butadiene 3a in the presence of chiral primary–tertiary amine catalyst and Pd(OAc)2. Different phosphine ligands were first examined, and we found that electron-rich bidentate phosphine ligands such as XantPhos and [(oxydi-2,1-phenylene)-bis-(diphenylphosphine)] (DPEPhos) could promote the addition reaction with good chemoselectivity (pathway A, Table 1, entries 1 and 3–5). In these cases, there was only trace or no telomerization adduct 5a detected by 1H NMR. A bulky tertiary aminocatalyst 1a together with DPEPhos-Pd complex was identified to give the optimal chemoselectivity and enantioselectivity, affording the addition product 4a with 83% yield and 93% ee (Table 1, entry 1). The use of a bulkier primary amine catalyst 1b led to slightly improved enantioselectivity but with compromised activity (Table 1, entry 6 vs 1). In the survey of different palladium salts, it was noted that the use of Pd(C3H5)Cp led to considerable formation of a telomerization adduct 5a accompanying 4a (Table 1, entry 7). Table 1 | Screening and Optimizationa Entry Variations Yield (%) Ratio ee (%) Pathway A 4a/5a 1 None 83 <19∶1 93 2 No 1a/TfOH 90 1∶9 rac 3 XantPhos 66 <19∶1 88 4 DPPE n.r. / / 5 BINAP n.r. / / 6 1b instead of 1a 75 <19∶1 95b 7 Pd(C3H5)Cp 80 7∶3 90 Pathway B 5a/4a 8 None 80 <19∶1 93 9 No 1a/TfOH 89 <19∶1 rac 10 PPh3 21 <19∶1 41 11 (p-OMe-Ph)3P 36 <19∶1 91 12 (o-Tol)3P 71 <19∶1 28 13 (o-OMe-Ph)3P Trace / / 14 PCy3 26 <19∶1 50 15 1b instead of 1a 50 4∶1 95b Note: DPPE, 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane; BINAP, 2,2′-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1′-binaphthalene; THF, tetrahydrofuran; GC, gas chromatography. aThe reaction is performed in 0.5 mL butadiene (2M in THF) under standard conditions with isolated yield. The product ratio is determined by NMR, and ee is determined by HPLC or GC. b0.3 mL of butadiene solution in THF is used. The chemoselective telomerization pathway (pathway B) was then separately optimized using Pd(C3H5)Cp as the metal catalyst. Considering the fully coordinated nature of the bis-π-allylpalladium species in the telomerization pathway (Scheme 1a), we reasoned the use of monodentate phosphine ligand may facilitate the expected reaction. Previously, monophosphine ligand was shown to mediate a racemic telomerization process via an enol mechanism.33,38–40 Monophosphine ligand was then screened in the current asymmetric enamine process (Table 1, entries 8 and 10–14). To our delight, the reaction in the presence of tri-p-tolylphosphine was found to exclusively afford the desired telomerization product 5a with 80% yield and 93% ee (Table 1, entry 8). The balance of the electronic and steric effect of phosphine ligand seems to be critical for the activity and chemo- and enantioselectivities. Trialkyl phosphines, such as tricyclohexylphosphine, showed poor yields and rather low enantioselectivities (Table 1, entry 14). The use of electroneutral triphenyl phosphine (entry 10), more electron-rich triaryl phosphine (entry 11), space-demanding ortho-substituted triaryl phosphine (entries 12 and 13), or electron-deficient triaryl phosphines ( Supporting Information Table S1) all led to serious reductions in both activity and enantioselectivity but maintained similar preference to telomerization. Phosphites or phosphoramidites were also examined, showing either poor activity or inferior chemoselectivity (see Supporting Information Table S2). The use of a bulkier catalyst 1b led to improved enantioselectivity but with sacrifices of both activity and chemoselectivity (Table 1, entry 6 vs 1). In control experiments, the reactions worked well in the absence of aminocatalyst with telomerization product 5a as the major product for both pathways A and B (Table 1, entries 2 and 9). This switch from addition to telomerization (Table 1, entry 1 vs 2 and entry 8 vs 9) suggests a critical role of the aminocatalyst in tuning chemoselectivity besides serving as the primary source of enantioselective control (vide infra). Substrate scope With optimized conditions in hand, we then explored the scope of the reactions. Different ester groups with various sizes were tolerated to give the expected allylic adducts for both pathways in good yields and high enantioselectivities (Table 2, entries 1–7 and 18–24). Polar groups such as NHBoc (Boc = t-butyl carbamate) and Cl were well tolerated (entries 6, 7, 23, and 24). Substitution on the α-position of β-ketoesters significantly influenced the reactivity. The ethyl-substituted substrate afforded the telomerization product 5h with 24% yield and 95% ee (Table 2, entry 25) but did not work in the addition pathway (Table 2, entry 8), likely due to steric effect arisen from α-substituent and the space-demanding bidentate-phosphine-palladium complex in the latter process. To our delight, the reaction with cyclic β-ketoesters, such as cyclohexanone, proceeded well to give the corresponding adducts with great control of both chemo- and enantioselectivities for both processes. Variations of ester groups of cyclohexanone retained high yields and enantioselectivities (Table 2, entries 9–11 and 26–29). The nitrogen- and oxygen-containing cyclohexanones could also give the corresponding products with high enantioselectivity, while decreased chemoselectivity was noted in these cases (Table 2, entries 12, 13, 30, and 31). For cyclopentanone, both processes worked well with a slight decrease of chemoselectivity in the telomerization procedure (Table 2, entries 14 and 32). In addition, β-ketoamides were tolerated and the addition pathway proceeded well to give the allylation products with 86–90% yield and 84–87% ee (Table 2, entries 15 and 16), while the telomerization pathway showed low enantioselectivity (Table 2, entry 33). Asymmetric 1,3-diketones, normally considered as challenging substrates in the typical enol process, could be incorporated to give allylation or telomerization products for both pathways A and B; however, the chemoselectivity was rather low in pathway A (Table 2, entries 17 and 34). Both pathways could be conducted in subgram scale with similar performance, highlighting the applicability of the present enantioselective catalysis (Table 2, entries 1 and 18). Table 2 | Substrates Scopea aThe reaction is performed in 0.5 mL of butadiene (2M in THF) under standard conditions, 40–72 h for both processes, isolated yield, ee is determined by HPLC or GC, 4/ 5 (for pathway A) or 5/ 4 (for pathway B) < 19:1 is determined by NMR; otherwise, the chemoselectivity is listed in the parentheses. bThe reaction is performed with 1b, 0.3 mL of butadiene in THF is used. We then applied the current catalysis in the late-stage allylic alkylation and telomerization of structurally complexed substrates bearing existing chiral centers. The menthyl esters (Table 2, entries 35 and 37), nopyl (Table 2, entry 36), and even a cholesteryl ester (Table 2, entry 38) could all work smoothly with high reactivity and stereoselectivity. We next explored the reactions with α-branched aldehydes, for which a highly enantioselective version for both processes has not been reported. In this case, the reactions proceeded to afford telomerization adduct 8a as the major product even under addition-favored conditions with unsatisfied enantioselectivities (Table 3, entries 2 and 3). Further investigation on different phosphine ligands did not improve the chemoselectivity and (p-Tol)3P still worked preferably for the telomerization process ( Supporting Information Table S3). Different aminocatalysts were further examined to improve the enantioselectivity. Table 3 | Optimization of α-Branched Aldehydesa Entry Variations Yield (%) ( 8a/ 7a) ee (%) 1 None 62 (16∶1) 83 2 Condition A 44 (5∶1) 72 3 1a/TfOH 64 (16∶1) 62 4 1b/TfOH 52 (7∶1) 82 5 1b/NHTf2 43 (5∶1) 77 6 1c/TfOH 74 (<19∶1) 71 aThe reaction is performed in 0.3 mL butadiene (2M in THF) for 60 h with isolated yield. ee is determined by HPLC, and the ratio of 8/ 7 is determined by NMR. The use of a bulkier tertiary amine 1b/trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TfOH) favored the enantioselectivity but not the activity and chemoselectivity (Table 3, entries 4 and 5). Changing t-butyl to an adamantyl group led to improved enantioselectivity with good chemoselectivity (Table 3, entry 6 vs 3). Using NHTf2 instead of TfOH could further increase the ee value to 83% (Table 3, entry 1). Further optimization did not result in additional improvement. It is complicated to tune both chemo- and stereoselectivity by factors from the substrate, the aminocatalyst, and its conjugated acid. A range of α-aryl propanals bearing either electron-donating or -withdrawing groups could be incorporated to afford mainly telomerization adducts 8 with high yields and enantioselectivities (Table 4). Table 4 | Substrate Scope of α-Branched Aldehydesa aThe reaction is performed in 0.3 mL butadiene (2M in THF) under standard conditions for 40–72 h, isolated yield, ee is determined by HPLC, and the ratio of 8/ 7 is determined by NMR. Mechanistic investigation Control experiments were conducted to gain insight into the reaction mechanism (Scheme 2a). When the bidentate ligand DPEPhos dosage in pathway A was reduced to 5 mol %, the addition was found to be accompanied by telomerization byproduct with 4a/ 5a = 7∶3, but when increasing the loading of monophosphine ligand (p-Me-Ph)3P to 20 mol % in pathway B, the chemoselectivity deteriorated with addition product appearing ( 5a/ 4a = 4∶1). These could be explained by considering that an electron-rich bidentate coordination is required for the hydropalladation to form I (Scheme 2c), a key intermediate for addition, whereas a delicate yet balanced binding with palladium between monophosphine ligand and butadiene is essential for the telomerization via intermediates IV and V (Scheme 2c). The switch to telomerization pathway in the absence of aminocatalyst 1b/TfOH under pathway A conditions (Table 1, entry 2 vs 1) suggests that the amine-TfOH conjugate could facilitate hydropalladation in the addition pathway by serving as a proton source. On the other hand, such a hydropalladation is disfavored due to the preferential binding with two molecules of butadiene in the context of monophosphine ligand as in the optimized telomerization pathway B.a Scheme 2 | (a–c) Control experiments and proposed mechanism. Download figure Download PowerPoint In line with previous studies,45–54,64 catalytic cycles for both processes could be proposed as described in Scheme 2c. For pathway A, a Pd-H complex I formed in situ underwent hydrocarbonation with butadiene to afford the key π-allyl-palladium species II, which then coupled with the enamine intermediate III to give the allylation product after hydrolysis. For pathway B, the reaction underwent an oxidative coupling of two coordinated 1,3-butadiene molecules to form the key bis-π-allylpalladium intermediate IV, and subsequent protonation and enamine coupling delivered the telomerization product after hydrolysis (Scheme 2c). Stoichiometric experiments with preformed enamine intermediate III proceeded to give the expected products with comparable enantioselectivity for both pathways, verifying the enamine catalytic nature (Scheme 2b). The observation of diminished chemoselectivity on the telomerization pathway further pinpoints the critical balance and competition between oxidative dimerization (Int. IV) and hydropalladation (Int. II). The presence of a stoichiometric amount of amine/TfOH facilitates the hydropalladation process, hence the formation of addition product 4a in this instance. In accordance with previous studies,60–63 a steric model could be proposed to account for the observed stereoselectivity.63 Bulkiness from the protonated amino moiety and the space-demanding palladium intermediate ( II or V) both contribute to the stereocontrol. Conclusion We have developed tunable asymmetric addition and telomerization of butadiene by synergistic enamine/palladium catalysis. A wide range of α-branched β-ketoesters and aldehydes could be directly coupled with butadiene, affording allylation or telomerization adducts bearing all-carbon quaternary centers in high efficiency and enantioselectivity. Footnote a For pathway B, a stoichiometric reaction with preformed enamine showed no activity in the absence of TfOH. Supporting Information Supporting Information is available and includes experimental procedures, characterization data, and 1H NMR, 13CNMR, 19F NMR and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatograms for products (PDF). Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing interests. Funding Information This research was made possible as a result of a generous grant from Natural Science Foundation of China. Acknowledgments The authors thank the Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 21672217, 21861132003, and 22031006) and Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program for financial support. References 1. Mukherjee S.; Yang J. W.; Hoffmann S.; List B.Asymmetric Enamine Catalysis.Chem. Rev.2007, 107, 5471–5569. Google Scholar 2. Kobayashi S.; Mori Y.; Fossey J. S.; Salter M. M.Catalytic Enantioselective Formation of C−C Bonds by Addition to Imines and Hydrazones: A Ten-Year Update.Chem. Rev.2011, 111, 2626–2704. Google Scholar 3. Beutner G. L.; Denmark S. E.Lewis Base Catalysis of the Mukaiyama Directed Aldol Reaction: 40 Years of Inspiration and Advances.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2013, 52, 9086–9096. Google Scholar 4. Johnson J. S.; Evans D. A.Chiral Bis(oxazoline) Copper (II) Complexes: Versatile Catalysts for Enantioselective Cycloaddition, Aldol, Michael, and Carbonyl Ene Reactions.Acc. Chem. Res.2000, 33, 325–335. Google Scholar 5. Trost B. M.; Crawley M. L.Asymmetric Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylations: Applications in Total Synthesis.Chem. Rev.2003, 103, 2921–2944. Google Scholar 6. Trost B. M.; Machacek M. R.; Aponick A.Predicting the Stereochemistry of Diphenylphosphino Benzoic Acid (DPPBA)-Based Palladium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation Reactions: A Working Model.Acc. Chem. Res.2006, 39, 747–760. Google Scholar 7. Trost B. M.; van Vranken D. L.Asymmetric Transition Metal-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylations.Chem. Rev.1996, 96, 395–422. Google Scholar 8. Lu Z.; Ma S.Metal-Catalyzed Enantioselective Allylation in Asymmetric Synthesis.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2008, 47, 258–297. Google Scholar 9. Trost B. M.; Schroeder G. M.Palladium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Alkylation of Ketone Enolates.J. Am. Chem. Soc.1999, 121, 6759–6760. Google Scholar 10. Kuwano R.; Ito Y.Catalytic Asymmetric Allylation of Prochiral Nucleophiles, α-Acetamido-β-Ketoesters.J. Am. Chem. Soc.1999, 121, 3236–3237. Google Scholar 11. Chen W.; Chen M.; Hartwig J. F.Diastereo- and Enantioselective Iridium-Catalyzed Allylation of Cyclic Ketone Enolates: Synergetic Effect of Ligands and Barium Enolates.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2014, 136, 15825–15828. Google Scholar 12. Chen J.-P.; Ding C.-H.; Liu W.; Hou X.-H.; Dai L.-X.Palladium-Catalyzed Regio-, Diastereo-, and Enantioselective Allylic Alkylation of Acylsilanes with Monosubstituted Allyl Substrates.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, 15493–15495. Google Scholar 13. Lei B.-L., Ding C.-H.; Yang X.-F.; Wan X.-L.; Hou X.-L.Kinetic Resolution of 2,3-Dihydro-2-Substituted 4-Quinolones by Palladium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2009, 131, 18250–18251. Google Scholar 14. Zheng W.-H.; Zheng B.-H.; Zhang Y.; Hou X.-L.Highly Regio-, Diastereo-, and Enantioselective Pd-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylation of Acyclic Ketone Enolates with Monosubstituted Allyl Substrates.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2007, 129, 7718–7719. Google Scholar 15. Nemoto T.; Matsu-moto T.; Masuda T.; Hitomi T.; Hatano K.; Hamada Y.P-Chirogenic Diaminophosphine Oxide: A New Class of Chiral Phosphorus Ligands for Asymmetric Catalysis.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2004, 126, 3690–3691. Google Scholar 16. Afewerki S.; Cordova A.Combinations of Aminocatalysts and Metal Catalysts: A Powerful Cooperative Approach in Selective Organic Synthesis.Chem. Rev.2016, 116, 13512–13570. Google Scholar 17. Deng Y.; Kumar S.; Wang H.Synergistic–Cooperative Combination of Enamine Catalysis with Transition Metal Catalysis.Chem. Commun.2014, 50, 4272–4284. Google Scholar 18. Du Z.-T.; Shao Z.-H.Combining Transition Metal Catalysis and Organocatalysis—An Update.Chem. Soc. Rev.2013, 42, 1337–1378. Google Scholar 19. Allen A. E.; MacMillan D. A Powerful for New 3, Google Scholar J. Google Scholar Chen D. Y.; Zhou L.; with Metal of and Chem. 47, Google Scholar Shao Zhang Transition Metal Catalysis and A New for Catalysis.Chem. Soc. Google Scholar Catalytic Alkylation of by Combination of and Chem. Int. Google Scholar S.; M. and of Google Scholar G. List Asymmetric of with Allylic by the of Different Chem. Int. 50, Google Scholar S.; M. S.; of with and Catalysis.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2014, 136, Google Scholar Trost B. M.; J. Asymmetric Addition of and Versatile for the of Chiral Am. Chem. Google Scholar Trost B. M.; Asymmetric Addition of to Am. Chem. Google Scholar Trost B. M.; A. B. Palladium-Catalyzed Addition of to an Google Scholar M.; and Enantioselective Addition of to of Asymmetric and All Chem. Int. Google Scholar of and via Catalysis Using and Am. Chem. Google Scholar M.; of Google Scholar S.; Krische M. in Metal-Catalyzed Carbonyl for in Synthesis.Angew. Chem. Int. Google Scholar M.; Krische M. Metal-Catalyzed of and with Carbonyl and Google Scholar Chen T.; Yang Yang Y.; of with under and Google Scholar J. Krische M. from the or via C–C of Am. Chem. Google Scholar J. Krische M. C–C Carbonyl Allylation from the or Acyclic as to Allyl Metal Am. Chem. Google Scholar J. R.; E.; L.; Krische M. of via of Google Scholar M. Krische M. Asymmetric of The of the in Am. Chem. Google Scholar Liu Y.; T.; Yang Y.; Liu S. Enantioselective Ketone Allylation with and Am. Chem. Google Scholar Hata K.; of with Google Scholar K.; Hata of with Chem. Soc. Google Scholar of to Google Scholar and of Butadiene under with and the of Am. Chem. Google Scholar A. Telomerization of Google Scholar M.; T.; L.; and Applications of a Versatile Chem. Int. Google Scholar of Telomerization and to the of In D. Google Scholar Chem. Int. Google Scholar R.; W.; R.; in the Palladium-Catalyzed of 2. and of Google Scholar M. Z.; van for the Selective Telomerization of with Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, Google Scholar J. M.; J. B. B. M.; J. of the Telomerization of of on Formation and Google Scholar Hartwig J. Addition of and to Google Scholar Chen L.; Zhou of with Am. Chem. Google Scholar E.; Malcolmson S. Pd-Catalyzed of Acyclic with Am. Chem. Google Scholar W.; Google Scholar Telomerization of with a of Different Google Scholar W.; Telomerization of Butadiene with and Google Scholar W.; W.; Telomerization of Butadiene with Chem. Soc. Chem. Google Scholar Yang and Enantioselective Allylic Alkylation of with under Google Scholar Wang J. L.; You Zhang Mi L.; Zhang L.; Luo S. Chiral Catalysis for Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation.J. Am. Chem. Google Scholar Zhou Wang Zhang L.; M.; Luo S. Addition to by Chiral Catalysis.J. Am. Chem. Google Scholar Zhou Zhang L.; M.; Luo S. Catalysis for Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation of with Allylic Chem. Int. Google Scholar Wang Zhou Yang K.; You Zhang L.; Luo S. Effect of in A Google Scholar Malcolmson S. and Addition of in the of Google Scholar Information Chinese Chemical primary authors thank the Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 21672217, 21861132003, and 22031006) and Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program for financial support.