Litcius/Paper detail

Hearing impairment and objectively measured physical activity: A systematic review

Pablo Martínez-Amezcua, Jonathan J. Suen, Frank R. Lin, Jennifer A. Schrack, Jennifer A. Deal

2021Journal of the American Geriatrics Society24 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is a fundamental and modifiable component of healthy aging.1 Hearing impairment (HI) is a common condition at older ages. Several consequences of HI are hypothesized to be mediated by lower PA. However, whether older adults with HI have lower levels of PA is not well understood. We conducted a systematic review of the association between HI and objectively measured PA among adults older than 50. Using controlled vocabulary for HI and PA concepts, we conducted a literature search in Medline (Ovid), Embase, and Cochrane Library (Appendix S1). The results were merged using EndNote (Clarivate Analytics) and imported into Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation). We followed a dual blinded review process for screening; a third reviewer resolved discrepancies. The final decision to include/exclude was based on the prespecified criteria. Of 1127 unique studies, 9 were selected by reviewers and 4 were excluded after a full-text review (different outcome = 3, different exposure = 1), leaving 5 studies. The included studies (Table 1) had between 184 and 1669 participants; all were cross-sectional and used the same data source—the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006 cycle. One study included only participants with diabetes. Mild hearing impairment not associated with PA category Moderate hearing impairment associated with greater odds of being in the next lower PA category (OR = 1.85 [95% CI:1.01, 3.41]) but no longer in a model that included BMI (OR = 1.70 [95% CI: 0.99, 2.91]) (1) HI categories: normal hearing, mild, and moderate or greater impairment (2) Normal hearing versus any hearing impairment (3) BPTA, continuously Hearing not associated with MVPA minutes: IRR 0.97 [95% CI: 0.88, 1.08] Significant interaction term (hearing impairment × vision impairment) Mild hearing impairment associated with 0.07 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.60] times fewer MVPA minutes Moderate or greater hearing impairment associated with 0.06 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.54] times fewer MVPA minutes Audiometry was performed by trained NHANES examiners.2 Hearing was defined by the speech-frequency (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) pure-tone average of the better hearing ear and categorized into normal hearing (≤25 dB HL), mild HI (>25–40 dB HL), and moderate or greater HI (>40 dB HL). PA was assessed, for seven consecutive days, using a hip-worn accelerometer (AM-7164, Actigraph, Pensacola, FL), only removed during sleep and water-based activities. PA was summarized into counts per minute (CPM). Studies calculated the time spent at different activity intensities, using predefined CPM thresholds: sedentary (<100), light (100–2019), moderate (2020–5998), and vigorous (≥5999).3 Two studies used moderate and vigorous (MVPA) minutes per day as an integer variable for their outcome; two studies used MVPA minutes to categorize participants into inactive (0 MVPA min/week), insufficiently active (1–149 MVPA min/week), and sufficiently active (≥150 MVPA min/week).1 Finally, one study used log-transformed sedentary minutes. The studies' findings are summarized in Table 1. One study4 investigated the association between hearing and vision impairments and time spent in MVPA. Neither mild nor moderate or greater HI were associated with PA. Another study5 investigated the association between HI and MVPA minutes among participants with diabetes. Mild and moderate or greater HI were associated with fewer MVPA minutes versus normal hearing. Of the two studies that used this metric, one6 found increased odds of being in the next lower activity group (e.g., inactive vs. insufficiently active) for those with moderate or greater HI versus normal hearing. However, after BMI adjustment, the association was no longer significant. The second study7 also found increased odds of being in the next lower PA group for those with moderate or greater HI versus normal hearing. Both studies found no significant association between mild HI and PA. The last study used log-transformed sedentary minutes (LTSM)8 and found that participants aged >65 years with normal hearing engaged in 0.07 (95% CI: −0.12, −0.01) fewer LTSM per day. Five studies analyzed the association of HI with objectively measured PA, all using NHANES data. The studies suggest that older adults with HI, particularly moderate or greater, may have lower PA levels and spend more time sedentary. However, two studies found no statistically significant associations.4, 6 Moreover, the PA metrics used in these studies have limitations. First, the validity of the CPM thresholds to classify PA intensities for older adults is unknown. Second, MVPA may be unattainable in the study population due to limited functional status. Third, using only MVPA minutes ignores differences in light intensity activity—the most common form of PA among older adults. Finally, emerging research suggests that novel PA metrics such as total PA volume, diurnal patterns, and fragmentation of activity may provide more discriminatory power in older populations than traditional PA measures.9 A study published after our search was completed investigated the association between HI and these novel PA metrics, finding that HI was associated with lower total PA volume and more PA fragmentation.10 Five studies investigated the association between HI and objectively measured PA in NHANES. Overall, hearing impairment was associated with lower levels of PA. The analyses and interpretation of some accelerometry metrics had limitations. Studies that use novel accelerometry-derived PA metrics are warranted. The authors thank Lori Rosman, MLS from the Johns Hopkins Welch Medical Library for her guidance and support in the development of our search strategy. Frank R. Lin is a consultant to Frequency Therapeutics, received speaker honoraria from Caption Call, and director of the Cochlear Center for Hearing and Public Health—a public health research center funded in part by a philanthropic gift from Cochlear Ltd to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All other authors have nothing additional to disclose. Pablo Martinez-Amezcua and Jennifer A. Deal conceived and designed the study. Pablo Martinez-Amezcua, Jonathan J. Suen, and Jennifer A. Deal conducted the title/abstract screening and full-text review of selected papers. Pablo Martinez-Amezcua wrote the manuscript, and all authors reviewed the study design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and made crucial revision to the manuscript. The authors' sponsors had no role in the design, methods, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the paper. Appendix S1. Systematic literature search strategy for hearing impairment and objectively measured physical activity. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyMEDLINECochrane LibraryOdds ratioGerontologyOddsCross-sectional studyHearing lossMeta-analysisPhysical therapyAudiologyInternal medicineLogistic regressionPathologyPopulationEnvironmental healthLawPolitical scienceNoise Effects and ManagementHearing Loss and RehabilitationPhysical Activity and Health
Hearing impairment and objectively measured physical activity: A systematic review | Litcius