Litcius/Paper detail

Patient Preferences for Point-of-Care Testing

Craig M. Lilly, Emily Ensom, Sean Teebagy, Danielle DiMezza, Denise Dunlap, Nathaniel Hafer, Bryan Buchholz, David D. McManus

2020Point of Care The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology20 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of current opinion of our community members for the characteristics, mode, and location of use, use cases, and overall enthusiasm for point-of-care testing (POCT) diagnosis and management tools are needed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Qualitative research methods were used to develop, refine, and evaluate hardcopy and electronic versions of a 45-item English language survey. The accuracy of the instrument was measured by recorded structured interview, and its precision was measured by comparison to its administration to a group of uncompensated volunteers. MAIN FINDINGS AND RESULTS: Comparison of survey and structured interview data demonstrated high levels of accuracy. Highly concordant with significant levels of correlation and of direct association indicated favorable precision. Ninety-three percent of respondents believed that POCT could improve their care, and 56% identified having a POCT in their home as a top priority. Accuracy, insurance coverage, immediacy of results, and ease of use were identified as the most important characteristics of a POCT. CONCLUSIONS: Community members strongly support the development of accurate, in-home devices that produce immediate results that can be used to diagnose, manage, and encourage their adherence to treatments for their medical conditions.

Topics & Concepts

Point-of-care testingImmediacyMedicineEnthusiasmPsychologyMedical physicsMedical emergencySocial psychologyPathologyEpistemologyPhilosophyEthics in Clinical ResearchMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Patient Preferences for Point-of-Care Testing | Litcius