Litcius/Paper detail

A Comparative Study of Friction Self-Piercing Riveting and Self-Piercing Riveting of Aluminum Alloy AA5182-O

Yunwu Ma, He Shan, Sizhe Niu, Yongbing Li, Zhongqin Lin, Ninshu Ma

2020Engineering54 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

In this paper, self-piercing riveting (SPR) and friction self-piercing riveting (F-SPR) processes were employed to join aluminum alloy AA5182-O sheets. Parallel studies were carried out to compare the two processes in terms of joint macrogeometry, tooling force, microhardness, quasi-static mechanical performance, and fatigue behavior. The results indicate that the F-SPR process formed both rivet–sheet interlocking and sheet–sheet solid-state bonding, whereas the SPR process only contained rivet–sheet interlocking. For the same rivet flaring, the F-SPR process required 63% less tooling force than the SPR process because of the softening effect of frictional heat and the lower rivet hardness of F-SPR. The decrease in the switch depth of the F-SPR resulted in more hardening of the aluminum alloy surrounding the rivet. The higher hardness of aluminum and formation of solid-state bonding enhanced the F-SPR joint stiffness under lap-shear loading, which contributed to the higher quasi-static lap-shear strength and longer fatigue life compared to those of the SPR joints.

Topics & Concepts

RivetMaterials scienceAlloyInterlockingIndentation hardnessJoint (building)SofteningMetallurgyComposite materialShear (geology)AluminiumStructural engineeringMicrostructureEngineeringAdvanced Welding Techniques AnalysisMetal Forming Simulation TechniquesAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
A Comparative Study of Friction Self-Piercing Riveting and Self-Piercing Riveting of Aluminum Alloy AA5182-O | Litcius