Investigating the gedanken experiment to destroy the event horizon of a regular black hole
Jie Jiang, Yunjiao Gao
Abstract
Recently, Li and Bambi proposed a hypothesis that the event horizon of a regular black hole can be destroyed because these objects have no gravitational singularity and therefore they are not protected by the weak cosmic censorship conjecture (WCCC). In this paper, to test their hypothesis, we perform the new version of the gedanken experiments proposed by Sorce and Wald to overcharge a near extremal static electrically regular black hole. After introducing the stability condition of the spacetime and the null energy condition of matter fields, we derive the first-order and second-order perturbation inequalities of the perturbation matter fields based on the Iyer-Wald formalism. As a result, we find that these regular black holes cannot be destroyed under the second-order approximation after these two perturbation inequalities are taken into account, even though they are not protected by the WCCC. Our results indicate that there might be some deeper mechanisms to protect the event horizon of the black holes.