New Physics is often not so new
Stéphane Maes
Abstract
Based on both the strength of the Standard Model (SM), often lamented by some looking to evolve it, and the results obtained in the multi-fold theory that can qualitatively answer many open issues with SM and the Standard Cosmological Model (ΛCDM), we argue that typically, the recent widely published hints of New Physics aren’t. In fact they usually are not confirmed by later experimentations, or other theories, or the SMG, the standard model with gravity effects non-negligible at its scales, which we do not consider as new Physics, but just the addition of gravity to it. Alternatively, we see them explainable by the multi-fold theory, that most would argue as New Physics, assuming it were confirmed, but that we prefer to see as rather confirming SM and ΛCDM by adding the SMG, and multi-fold explanations, at the difference of other approaches like supersymmetry, superstrings, or say MOND. Indeed no new fundamental particle or force are involved, and there is no need to macroscopically invalidate or modify GR.