Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistulae Creation by Ellipsys and WavelinQ Devices
Robert Shahverdyan, Gerald A. Beathard, Nasir Mushtaq, Terry Litchfield, Peter R. Nelson, William C. Jennings
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of Ellipsys with those of WavelinQ-4F percutaneous arteriovenous fistulae (pAVF) devices in a single center by a single operator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: . A procedure sequence algorithm was followed for selecting all vascular accesses created. RESULTS: Ellipsys outcomes were compared to WavelinQ outcomes. Technical success was 100% versus 97%, respectively, and median procedure times were 14 versus 63 minutes, respectively (P < .001), with 183 (1-487) versus 185 (0-760) days follow-up, respectively. Maturation at 4 weeks was 68.3% versus 54.3%, respectively, and median times to cannulation were 60 (1-164) versus 90 (1-180) days, respectively. Successful pAVF dialysis was established in 31 of 39 patients (79.5%) versus 14 of 24 patients (58%), respectively (P = .071), dialysis patients with access-related adverse events observed in 4 individuals (1 Ellipsys versus 3 WavelinQ). Six patients (5 versus 1) with matured outflow from previous AVFs underwent first-day cannulations. Interventions were performed in 27.7% (33 Ellipsys) and 26.5% (15 WavelinQ) patients, and the number of interventions per patient-years was 0.96 versus 0.46, respectively. pAVF failure was seen in 15.4% versus 37.1% patients, respectively (P = .0137). Secondary patency at 12 months was significantly higher among patients who had an Ellipsys procedure (82%) than among those who underwent the WavelinQ procedure (60%). CONCLUSIONS: pAVFs were created with high technical success and low complications with both devices. Ellipsys pAVFs demonstrated significantly shorter procedure times without a need for radiation exposure and with superior secondary patency.