Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of classical and Bayesian imaging in radio interferometry

Philipp Arras, Hertzog L. Bester, R. A. Perley, Reimar Leike, O. Smirnov, Rüdiger Westermann, T. A. Enßlin

2020Astronomy and Astrophysics44 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

CLEAN , the commonly employed imaging algorithm in radio interferometry, suffers from a number of shortcomings: In its basic version, it does not have the concept of diffuse flux, and the common practice of convolving the CLEAN components with the CLEAN beam erases the potential for super-resolution; it does not output uncertainty information; it produces images with unphysical negative flux regions; and its results are highly dependent on the so-called weighting scheme as well as on any human choice of CLEAN masks for guiding the imaging. Here, we present the Bayesian imaging algorithm resolve , which solves the above problems and naturally leads to super-resolution. We take a VLA observation of Cygnus A at four different frequencies and image it with single-scale CLEAN , multi-scale CLEAN , and resolve . Alongside the sky brightness distribution, resolve estimates a baseline-dependent correction function for the noise budget, the Bayesian equivalent of a weighting scheme. We report noise correction factors between 0.4 and 429. The enhancements achieved by resolve come at the cost of higher computational effort.

Topics & Concepts

WeightingBayesian probabilityInterferometryNoise (video)Computer scienceAlgorithmBrightnessScale (ratio)Flux (metallurgy)Image (mathematics)Artificial intelligencePhysicsOpticsAcousticsMetallurgyMaterials scienceQuantum mechanicsRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Comparison of classical and Bayesian imaging in radio interferometry | Litcius