Tercile Forecasts for Extending the Horizon of Skillful Hydrological Predictions
Konrad Bogner, Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Luzi Bernhard, Massimiliano Zappa, Samuel Monhart, Christoph Spirig
Abstract
Abstract Medium to subseasonal hydrological forecasts contain more information relevant to water and environmental management tasks than climatological forecasts. However, extracting this information at the most appropriate level of accuracy and spatiotemporal resolution remains a difficulty. Many studies show that the skill of the extended range forecasts with daily resolution tends toward zero after 7–14 days for small mountainous catchments. Beyond that forecast horizon the application of highly sophisticated pre- and postprocessing methods generally produce limited gains. Consequently, current forecasting techniques cannot effectively represent forecast extremes at extended ranges such as anomalously high and low runoff or soil moisture. To tackle these deficiencies, this study analyzes the value of tercile forecasts for weekly aggregates of runoff and soil moisture forecasts available at a daily resolution for Switzerland. The forecasts are classified into three categories: below, above, and normal conditions, which are derived from long-term simulations and correspond approximately to climatological conditions. To achieve improved reliability and skill of the predicted tercile probabilities, a nonparametric probabilistic classification method has been tested. It is based on Gaussian process (GP), which is attractive in machine learning (ML) applications because of its ability to estimate the predictive uncertainty. The outcome of these postprocessed forecasts was compared to preprocessing methods where the meteorological predictions are statistically corrected before passing to the hydrological model. Our results indicate that tercile forecasts of weekly aggregates produce a suitable skill up to 3 weeks lead time using the preprocessed input and up to 4 weeks lead time using the GP method.