Quantitative parameters of dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography for evaluating differentiation grade and lymphovascular and perineural invasion in colorectal adenocarcinoma
Jinghua Chen, Lei Ni, Jingjing Gong, Jie Wu, Tingting Qian, Mengjia Wang, Jian Huang, Kefu Liu
Abstract
PurposeTo explore the predictive value of dual-layer spectral detector CT (SDCT) quantitative parameters for determining differentiation grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRAC) patients.MethodsA total of 106 eligible patients with CRAC were included in this study. Spectral parameters, including CT values at 40 and 100 keV, the effective atomic number (Zeff), the iodine concentration (IC), the slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit (HU) curve (λHU), and the normalized iodine concentration (NIC) in the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP), were compared according to the differentiation grade and the status of LVI and PNI. The diagnostic accuracies of the quantitative parameters with statistical significance were determined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.ResultsThere were 57 males and 49 females aged 43–86 (69 ± 10) years. The measured values of the spectral quantitative parameters of the CRAC were consistent within the observer (ICC range: 0.800–0.926). The 40 keV-AP, IC-AP, NIC-AP, 40 keV-VP, and IC-VP were significantly different among the different differentiation grades in the CRAC (P = 0.040, AUC = 0.673; P = 0.035, AUC = 0.684; P = 0.031, AUC = 0.639; P = 0.044, AUC = 0.663 and P = 0.035, AUC = 0.666, respectively). A statistically significant difference was observed in 40 keV-VP, 100 keV-VP, Zeff-VP, IC-VP, and λHU-VP between LVI-positive and LVI-negative patients (P = 0.003, AUC = 0.688; P = 0.015, AUC = 0.644; P = 0.001, AUC = 0.688; P = 0.001, AUC = 0.703 and P = 0.003, AUC = 0.677, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the values of the spectral parameters of the PNI state of patients with CRAC (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe quantitative parameters of SDCT had good diagnostic efficacy in differentiating between different grades and statuses of LVI in patients with CRAC; however, SDCT did not have value for identifying the state of PNI.