Litcius/Paper detail

Longer is Better for Endoscopic Follow-up of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Ureteroscopic Treatment: An Evaluation Spanning 10 Years of Data

Orlane Figaroa, Nora Hendriks, Guido M. Kamphuis, Harrie P. Beerlage, R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar, Adriaan D. Bins, Joyce Baard

2023European Urology Oncology16 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumour recurrences are frequent among patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with ureteroscopy (URS). Therefore, guidelines recommend a strict follow-up regimen, but there is little evidence on how to do this. OBJECTIVE: To analyse outcomes during our follow-up regimen and the impact on treatment in terms of ipsilateral UTUC recurrence, treatment conversion, and tumour upgrading, and to evaluate potential prognostic factors, including second-look URS outcomes. A secondary objective was to evaluate survival outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The single-centre cohort included all adult patients with nonmetastatic UTUC treated with URS from January 2010 to December 2020. Follow-up involved endoscopy at 3-mo intervals in the first year, then at 6-mo intervals up to year 3, and yearly thereafter. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses were performed for the follow-up outcomes. The Andersen-Gill model for recurrent event analysis was used to analyse tumour recurrences, and multivariable Cox regression to analyse for predictors for treatment conversion in low-grade tumours. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We analysed 71 patients with median follow-up of 49.5 mo. The overall 2-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 22%. In low-grade disease, the 1-yr RFS rate was 50% and the 2-yr RFS rate was 29%. Treatment was converted to radical nephroureterectomy for 23 patients, at a median time to conversion of 9.9 mo. Upgrading was seen in 13 patients, at a median time to upgrading of 21.9 mo. No factors were prognostic for either tumour recurrence or treatment conversion. The 5-yr OS, CSS, and MFS rates were 82%, 86%, and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that it is rational to extend endoscopic follow-up for UTUC treated with URS, as clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur beyond the current 6-mo guideline recommendation. Second-look URS outcomes were not prognostic for tumour recurrence or treatment conversion during follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study results show that for patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract treated with kidney-sparing surgery through a small telescope called a ureteroscope (URS), most of the clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur outside the current recommended follow-up of 6 months. Therefore, URS follow-up should be extended for these patients.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineUrothelial carcinomaUreteroscopyUrologyOncologyInternal medicineGeneral surgeryUreterCancerBladder cancerBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies
Longer is Better for Endoscopic Follow-up of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Ureteroscopic Treatment: An Evaluation Spanning 10 Years of Data | Litcius