Litcius/Paper detail

Rate and nature of complications with leadless transcatheter pacemakers compared with transvenous pacemakers: results from an Italian multicentre large population analysis

Pietro Palmisano, Domenico Facchin, Matteo Ziacchi, Gerardo Nigro, Antonino Nicosia, Maria Grazia Bongiorni, Luca Tomasi, Andrea Rossi, Paolo De Filippo, Giuseppe Sgarito, Roberto Verlato, Michele Silvestro, Saverio Iacopino

2022EP Europace38 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

AIMS: The safety and efficacy of leadless intracardiac-permanent pacemaker (L-PM) have been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, but data on comparisons with conventional transvenous-permanent pacemaker (T-PM) collected in a consecutive, prospective fashion are limited. The aim of this analysis was to compare the rate and the nature of device-related complications between patients undergoing L-PM vs. T-PM implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, multicentre, observational project enrolling consecutive patients who underwent L-PM or T-PM implantation. The rate and nature of device-related complications were analysed and compared between the two groups. Individual 1:1 propensity matching of baseline characteristics was performed. A total of 2669 (n = 665 L-PM) patients were included and followed for a median of 39 months, L-PM patients were on average older and had more co-morbidities. The risk of device-related complications at 12 months was significantly lower in the L-PM group (0.5% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.009). Propensity matching yielded 442 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, L-PM patients trended toward having a lower risk of overall device-related complications (P = 0.129), had a similar risk of early complications (≤30 days) (P = 1.000), and had a significantly lower risk of late complications (>30 days) (P = 0.031). All complications observed in L-PM group were early. Most (75.0%) of complications observed in T-PM group were lead- or pocket-related. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, the risk of device-related complications associated with L-PM implantation tended to be lower than that of T-PM. Specifically, the risk of early complications was similar in two types of PMs, while the risk of late complications was significantly lower for L-PM than T-PM.

Topics & Concepts

MedicinePropensity score matchingIntracardiac injectionProspective cohort studySurgeryPooled analysisObservational studyPermanent pacemakerPopulationClinical trialInternal medicineConfidence intervalEnvironmental healthCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments