Litcius/Paper detail

Hate Speech Criteria: A Modular Approach to Task-Specific Hate Speech Definitions

Urja Khurana, Ivar Vermeulen, Eric Nalisnick, Marloes Van Noorloos, Antske Fokkens

202210 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The subjectivity of recognizing hate speech makes it a complex task. This is also reflected by different and incomplete definitions in NLP. We present hate speech criteria, developed with perspectives from law and social science, with the aim of helping researchers create more precise definitions and annotation guidelines on five aspects: (1) target groups, (2) dominance, (3) perpetrator characteristics, (4) type of negative group reference, and the (5) type of potential consequences/effects. Definitions can be structured so that they cover a more broad or more narrow phenomenon. As such, conscious choices can be made on specifying criteria or leaving them open. We argue that the goal and exact task developers have in mind should determine how the scope of hate speech is defined. We provide an overview of the properties of English datasets from hatespeechdata.com that may help select the most suitable dataset for a specific scenario.

Topics & Concepts

Computer scienceTask (project management)AnnotationSpeech actPhenomenonScope (computer science)Natural language processingDominance (genetics)SubjectivityArtificial intelligenceModular designLinguisticsEpistemologyPhilosophyChemistryBiochemistryOperating systemProgramming languageManagementEconomicsGeneHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Hate Speech Criteria: A Modular Approach to Task-Specific Hate Speech Definitions | Litcius