Concordance between practice and published evidence in the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis in Japan: A cross-sectional web-questionnaire survey
Yoshia Miyawaki, Takao Fujii, Keisuke Anan, Masanari Kodera, Masao Kikuchi, Ken‐ei Sada, Kenji Nagasaka, Masashi Bando, Hitoshi Sugiyama, Shinya Kaname, Masayoshi Harigai, Naoto Tamura
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a descriptive study of the physicians' evidence-practice gap for adults covered by the 2017 clinical practice guidelines for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis in Japan. METHODS: This web-based survey, conducted between January and February 2021, involved physicians who had treated at least five patients in the preceding year at a regional core hospital. The outcome was the physicians' experience in treating patients with microscopic polyangiitis or granulomatosis with polyangiitis [prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)], defined as treating at least 60% of their patients with the recommended therapy during the year. A modified Poisson regression analysis was performed to explore the factors associated with concordance. RESULTS: The 202 participants included 49 pulmonologists, 65 nephrologists, 61 rheumatologists, and other physicians. The concordance was 31.5% (95% CI, 25.1-38.5) of physicians who used cyclophosphamide or rituximab for the induction of remission. Rheumatology showed the highest concordance with published evidence (risk ratio = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.10-5.22, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest an evidence-practice gap, which varies substantially among subspecialties. Further studies and a new promotional initiative are necessary to close this gap in clinical practice.