Litcius/Paper detail

Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis

Rachel Farber, Nehmat Houssami, Sally Wortley, Gemma Jacklyn, M. Luke Marinovich, Kevin McGeechan, Alexandra Barratt, Katy Bell

2020JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute43 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast screening programs replaced film mammography with digital mammography, and the effects of this practice shift in population screening on health outcomes can be measured through examination of cancer detection and interval cancer rates. METHODS: A systematic review and random effects meta-analysis were undertaken. Seven databases were searched for publications that compared film with digital mammography within the same population of asymptomatic women and reported cancer detection and/or interval cancer rates. RESULTS: The analysis included 24 studies with 16 583 743 screening examinations (10 968 843 film and 5 614 900 digital). The pooled difference in the cancer detection rate showed an increase of 0.51 per 1000 screens (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19 to 0.83), greater relative increase for ductal carcinoma in situ (25.2%, 95% CI = 17.4% to 33.5%) than invasive (4%, 95% CI = -3% to 13%), and a recall rate increase of 6.95 (95% CI = 3.47 to 10.42) per 1000 screens after the transition from film to digital mammography. Seven studies (80.8% of screens) reported interval cancers: the pooled difference showed no change in the interval cancer rate with -0.02 per 1000 screens (95% CI = -0.06 to 0.03). Restricting analysis to studies at low risk of bias resulted in findings consistent with the overall pooled results for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in cancer detection following the practice shift to digital mammography did not translate into a reduction in the interval cancer rate. Recall rates were increased. These results suggest the transition from film to digital mammography did not result in health benefits for screened women. This analysis reinforces the need to carefully evaluate effects of future changes in technology, such as tomosynthesis, to ensure new technology leads to improved health outcomes and beyond technical gains.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineMammographyConfidence intervalBreast cancerDigital mammographyPopulationMeta-analysisAsymptomaticCancerCancer screeningGynecologyInternal medicineEnvironmental healthDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingAI in cancer detectionGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis | Litcius