Litcius/Paper detail

MOOCs Lack Interactivity and Collaborativeness: Evaluating MOOC Platforms

Dilrukshi Gamage, Indika Perera, Shantha Fernando

2020International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)61 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have considered to be a potential to disseminate engineering education at scale. However, the pedagogical requirement demanded engineering student to equip with specific skillsets such as communication, interactivity, and collaboration. Yet, MOOCs are skeptical of facilitating those skills. Generally, MOOCs evaluated against accessibility and usability. These evaluations may not perceive whether the platform designs in MOOCs support to much-needed interactions and collaboration required in engineering education. We evaluated 6 MOOC platform designs under the lens of collaboration and types of interactions which occur as learner to learner, learner to instructor, learner to platform and learner to content. Evaluation criteria were derived us-ing previous frameworks and evaluations were conducted using 10 participants. Based on each criterion a matrix was formed with a weight to compare results. We found overall collaboration opportunities in platforms are significantly less than the opportunities to interact. Based on the findings we provide 5 design recommendations and provide a future direction for MOOC platform designs which en-ables facilitation to engineering education through MOOCs.

Topics & Concepts

InteractivityComputer scienceUsabilityMultimediaDisseminationScale (ratio)Human–computer interactionQuantum mechanicsTelecommunicationsPhysicsOnline Learning and AnalyticsE-Learning and Knowledge Management
MOOCs Lack Interactivity and Collaborativeness: Evaluating MOOC Platforms | Litcius