The Value of Thermal Imaging for Knee Arthritis: A Single-Center Observational Study
Soo Min Ahn, Joo Hyang Chun, Seokchan Hong, Chang‐Keun Lee, Bin Yoo, Ji Seon Oh, Yong‐Gil Kim
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare (non-contact) thermal imaging with power Doppler (PD) for the evaluation of knee arthritis with joint effusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with knee arthritis who were scheduled to undergo an arthrocentesis of the knee from April to December 2020 at a single tertiary hospital. A thermography camera, FLIR ONE Pro, was used to obtain both thermographic and digital images on subjects. For each subject, thermography, ultrasonography, arthrocentesis, and blood tests were conducted at the same study visit. Thermal imaging findings and clinical characteristics were compared by dividing the subjects into PD-positive and PD-negative groups on ultrasound. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the accuracy of PD positivity. RESULTS: =0.010). The area under the ROC curve of the point measurement of T max, T min, and T ave ranged between 0.764 and 0.790. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that high thermographic temperatures of the knee suggest a positive PD signal. Thus, thermography might be used as an adjuvant tool of PD for non-invasive evaluation of knee arthritis.