Litcius/Paper detail

Early clinical and haemodynamic matched comparison of balloon-expandable valves

José Raúl Delgado-Arana, María X Gordillo-Monge, Jonathan Halim, Federico De Marco, Carlo Trani, Pedro Martín, Fabio Infusino, Marco Ancona, Peter den Heijer, Francesco Bedogni, Luis Nombela‐Franco, Raúl Moreno, Gennaro Sargella, Matteo Montorfano, Cristhian H. Aristizábal‐Duque, Teresa Romero-Delgado, Sandra Santos‐Martínez, Alejandro Barrero, Itziar Gomez Salvador, Sander Ijsselmuiden, Alfredo Redondo Diéguez, J. Alberto San Román, Ignacio J. Amat‐Santos

2021Heart57 citationsDOI

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The balloon-expandable Sapien-3 valve demonstrated superior results in terms of residual aortic regurgitation when compared with self-expandable devices. We aimed to compare for the first-time early outcomes of Sapien-3 transcatheter heart valve (THV) with the balloon-expandable Myval device. METHODS: Consecutive real-world patients from nine European institutions with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis treated either with Sapien-3 or Myval THV devices after June 2018 were compared. Early clinical outcomes were prospectively gathered and blinded analysis of 30-day echocardiography was conducted. Matching for the following variables was performed: age, body surface area, Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score, left ventricular function, mean gradient, transfemoral approach, aortic valvular calcium, aortic annulus mean diameter, area and eccentricity index. RESULTS: A total of 416 patients treated either with the Sapien-3 (n=286, 68.7%) or with Myval THV (n=130, 31.3%) were included and 103 pairs compared after matching. Baseline characteristics were similar. Procedural success rate (Sapien-3: 94.2%; Myval: 93.2%, p=0.219), 30-day mortality (Sapien-3: 2.9%; Myval: 0.97%, p=0.625), clinical efficacy (12.6 vs 4.9%, p=0.057) and early safety (12.6 vs 4.9%, p=0.096) were comparable. There was a lower need for new permanent pacemaker (15.5 vs 5.8% p=0.020) with Myval. No significant differences were found in terms of ≥moderate aortic regurgitation (1% for Sapien-3, 0% for Myval, p=0.314), but mean gradients were higher following Sapien-3 than after Myval (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The new Myval balloon-expandable THV was favourable in terms of safety, with low rate of permanent pacemaker and with favourable residual gradients and paravalvular leak rate according to blinded echocardiographic analysis.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineCardiac skeletonCardiologyStenosisAortic valve stenosisInternal medicineRegurgitation (circulation)Aortic valveBody surface areaBalloonSurgeryAortic valve replacementCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsCongenital Heart Disease StudiesAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Early clinical and haemodynamic matched comparison of balloon-expandable valves | Litcius