Litcius/Paper detail

Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM2.5 and PM10 Measurements

Natalie Crnosija, Misti Levy Zamora, Ana M. Rule, Devon Payne-Sturges

2022International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health15 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 of them in a controlled laboratory setting by exposing them to PM10 and PM2.5 and compared the response with Plantower A003 measurements. The overall coefficient of determination (R2) of measured PM2.5 was 0.76 and of PM10 it was 0.73, but the Flows’ accuracy improved after each introduction of incense. Overall, these findings suggest that the Flow can be a useful air quality monitoring tool in air pollution areas with higher concentrations, when incorporated into other monitoring frameworks and when used in aggregate. The broader environmental implications of this work are that it is possible for individuals and groups to monitor their individual exposure to particulate matter pollution.

Topics & Concepts

Air quality indexEnvironmental scienceParticulatesAir pollutionAir monitoringEnvironmental monitoringPopulationPollutionExposure assessmentQuality (philosophy)Environmental engineeringMeteorologyEnvironmental healthStatisticsGeographyChemistryMathematicsOrganic chemistryPhilosophyEpistemologyMedicineBiologyEcologyAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingAir Quality and Health ImpactsNoise Effects and Management
Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM2.5 and PM10 Measurements | Litcius