Litcius/Paper detail

Inequalities and identity processes in crises: Recommendations for facilitating safe response to the COVID‐19 pandemic

Anne Templeton, Selin Tekin, Carina Hoerst, Sara Vestergren, Louise Davidson, Susie Ballentyne, Hannah Madsen, Sanjeedah Choudhury

2020British Journal of Social Psychology108 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Structural inequalities and identity processes are pivotal to understanding public response to COVID-19. We discuss how identity processes can be used to promote community-level support, safe normative behaviour, and increase compliance with guidance. However, we caution how government failure to account for structural inequalities can alienate vulnerable groups, inhibit groups from being able to follow guidance, and lead to the creation of new groups in response to illegitimate treatment. Moreover, we look ahead to the longitudinal impacts of inequalities during pandemics and advise government bodies should address identity-based inequalities to mitigate negative relations with the public and subsequent collective protest.

Topics & Concepts

InequalityNormativeGovernment (linguistics)Identity (music)PandemicCollective identityCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Social psychologySocial identity theoryPsychology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPublic healthPublic relationsPolitical scienceSocial groupPoliticsMedicineLawDiseaseMathematical analysisNursingVirologyPathologyLinguisticsInfectious disease (medical specialty)OutbreakPhysicsPhilosophyMathematicsAcousticsCommunity Health and DevelopmentDisaster Management and ResilienceHomelessness and Social Issues
Inequalities and identity processes in crises: Recommendations for facilitating safe response to the COVID‐19 pandemic | Litcius