Medial congruent polyethylene design show different tibiofemoral kinematics and enhanced congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining design for total knee arthroplasty—an in vivo randomized controlled study of gait using dynamic radiostereometry
Emil Toft Petersen, Søren Rytter, Daan Koppens, Jesper Dalsgaard, Torben Bæk Hansen, Michael Skipper Andersen, Maiken Stilling
Abstract
PURPOSE: New total knee arthroplasty implant designs attempt to normalize kinematics patterns that may improve functional performance and patient satisfaction. It was hypothesized that a more medial congruent (MC) anatomic bearing design (1) influences the tibiofemoral kinematics and (2) enhances articular congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining (CR) bearing design. METHODS: In this double-blinded randomized study, 66 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomly included in two groups: MC (n = 31) and CR (n = 33). Clinical characteristics such as knee ligament lesions and knee osteoarthritis scores were graded on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and radiography. At the 1-year follow-up, dynamic radiostereometric analysis was used to assess tibiofemoral joint kinematics and articulation congruency. Patient-reported outcome measures, Oxford Knee Score, the Forgotten Joint Score, and the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, were assessed preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Compared to the CR bearing, the MC bearing displayed an offset with approximately 3 mm greater anterior tibial drawer (p < 0.001) during the entire motion, and up to approximately 3.5 degrees more tibial external rotation (p = 0.004) from mid-swing to the end of the gait cycle at the 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, the congruency area in the joint articulation was larger during approximately 80% of the gait cycle for the MC bearing compared to the CR. The patient-reported outcome measures improved (p < 0.001), but there were no differences between groups. In addition, there were no differences in clinical characteristics and there were no knee revisions or recognized deep infections during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that the MC-bearing design changes tibiofemoral kinematics and increases the area of congruency towards more native knee kinematics than the CR bearing. In perspective this may contribute to a more stabilized knee motion, restoring the patient's confidence in knee function during daily activities.