Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial

Farshid Rayati, M. Haeri, A. Norouziha, Razieh Jabbarian

2020British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery11 citationsDOI

Topics & Concepts

ArticaineBuccal administrationEpinephrineLidocaineMedicineAnesthesiaDouble blindMolarInfiltration (HVAC)DentistryPlaceboMaterials scienceAlternative medicinePathologyComposite materialDental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesAnesthesia and Pain ManagementPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial | Litcius