Litcius/Paper detail

Validation of the obesity paradox by body mass index and waist circumference in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Yuichiro Shirahama, Noriaki Tabata, Kenji Sakamoto, Ryota Sato, Kenshi Yamanaga, Koichiro Fujisue, Daisuke Sueta, Satoshi Araki, Seiji Takashio, Yuichiro Arima, Seiji Hokimoto, Koji Sato, Tomohiro Sakamoto, Kōichi Nakao, Hideki Shimomura, Toshiyuki Matsumura, Shinji Tayama, Kazuteru Fujimoto, Shuichi Oshima, Shinichi Nakamura, Ryusuke Tsunoda, Toyoki Hirose, Koichi Kikuta, Naritsugu Sakaino, Nobuyasu Yamamoto, Ichiro Kajiwara, Satoru Suzuki, Eiichiro Yamamoto, Koichi Kaikita, Kenichi Matsushita, Kenichi Tsujita, On behalf of the Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study (KICS) Investigators, Shinsuke Hanatani, Hiroki Usuku, Koichiro Fujisue, Kenshi Yamanaga, Koji Sato, Masahide Nagano, Takashi Fukunaga, Eiji Taguchi, Eiji Horio, Yuji Ogura, Mitsutoshi Miura, Takashi Kudo, Yoshihiro Yamada, Koji Abe, Hideki Doi, Hiroaki Kusaka, Shinji Tayama, Yuji Miyao, Kenji Morihisa, Shunichiro Fuchigami, Taku Rokutanda, Tsunenori Nishijima, Katsuo Noda, Ryuichiro Fukushima, Takashi Uemura, Tetsuji Katayama, Shinichi Nakamura, Hiromi Yoshimura, Tomokazu Ikemoto, Teruhiko Ito, Ryusuke Tsunoda, Tomoaki Uemura, Hideki Maruyama, Takashi Miyazaki, Eisaku Okuyama, Koichi Kikuta, Shota Nakamura, Kazumasa Kurogi, Tadasuke Chitose, Takamichi Ono, Yosuke Hanaoka, Hirofumi Kurokawa, Shinzo Miyamoto, Masakazu Matsukawa, Junichi Matsubara

2022International Journal of Obesity17 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The paradoxical association of obesity with mortality, named the “obesity paradox”, has been inconsistent, possibly due to a difference between body mass index (BMI) and central obesity, estimated by waist circumference (WC) as patterns of adiposity. We enrolled 8513 participants from the Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study, a multicenter registry that included consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at 18 centers between 2008 and 2017 in Japan. Patients were divided into quartiles in ascending order of the BMI or WC. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death within a year. There were 186 deaths (case fatality rate, 22.1/1000 person-years) during the follow-up period. The lowest group (1st quartile) of BMI or WC had the worst prognosis among the quartiles (1st quartile, 4.2%; 2nd quartile, 1.9%; 3rd quartile, 1.5%; 4th quartile, 1.1%; P < 0.001 (χ 2 ) and 1st quartile, 4.1%; 2nd quartile, 2.3%; 3rd quartile, 1.2%; 4th quartile, 1.5%; P < 0.001 (χ 2 ), respectively). Similar results were obtained for cardiovascular death. In a multivariable analysis adjusted by nine conventional factors, the lowest group (1st quartile) of BMI (hazards ratio, 2.748; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.712–4.411) and WC (hazards ratio, 2.340; 95% CI, 1.525–3.589) were independent prognostic factors for all-cause mortality. By dividing the participants into two groups according to either the BMI or WC based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and World Health Organization classification, the highest mortality was observed in the lower group. However, the C-statistic after adding BMI (quartile) to conventional factors was found to be slightly higher than BMI (two categories) and WC (two categories) (0.735 vs. 0.734). The obesity paradox was observed in patients after PCI, and single-use of BMI (or WC) was sufficient to predict the prognosis of patients after PCI.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineQuartileBody mass indexWaistObesityPercutaneous coronary interventionConfidence intervalInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention