Litcius/Paper detail

Cefiderocol use for the treatment of infections by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an Italian multicentre real-life experience

Matteo Piccica, Michele Spinicci, Annarita Botta, Vincenzo Bianco, Filippo Lagi, Lucia Graziani, Alessandro Faragona, Roberto Parrella, Tommaso Giani, Andrea Bartolini, Gianluca Morroni, Mariano Bernardo, Gian María Rossolini, Marcello Tavio, Andrea Giacometti, Alessandro Bartoloni

2023Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy29 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin with promising activity against most carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB). However, extensive postmarketing experiences are lacking. This study aimed to analyse the early experience on cefiderocol postmarketing use at three tertiary care hospitals in Italy. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with infections caused by CRGNB treated with cefiderocol at three Italian tertiary care hospitals from 1 March 2021 to 30 June 2022. A multivariate Cox model was used to identify predictors of 30 day mortality. A propensity score (PS) analysis with inverse probability weighting (IPW) was also performed to compare the treatment effect of cefiderocol monotherapy (CM) versus combination regimens (CCRs). RESULTS: The cohort included 142 patients (72% male, median age 67 years, with 89 cases of Acinetobacter baumannii infection, 22 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 27 cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 4 of other pathogens). The 30 day all-cause mortality was 37% (52/142). We found no association between bacterial species and mortality. In multivariate analysis, a Charlson Comorbidity Index >3 was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 5.02, 95% CI 2.37-10.66, P < 0.001). In contrast, polymicrobial infection (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, P < 0.05) was associated with lower mortality. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients receiving CM (n = 70) and those receiving a CCR (n = 72) (33% versus 40%, respectively), even when adjusted for IPW-PS (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.63-1.96, P = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Real-life data confirm that cefiderocol is a promising option against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, even as monotherapy.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineCephalosporinInternal medicineAcinetobacter baumanniiPseudomonas aeruginosaCarbapenemAcinetobacterAntibioticsMicrobiologyBiologyBacteriaGeneticsAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Cefiderocol use for the treatment of infections by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an Italian multicentre real-life experience | Litcius