Selective and competitive functions of the AAR and UPR pathways in stress-induced angiogenesis
Fan Zhang, Qiyu Zeng, Hao Xu, Aining Xu, Dian-Jia Liu, Ning-Zhe Li, Yi Chen, Yi Jin, Chunhui Xu, Chang‐Zhou Feng, Yuanliang Zhang, Dan Liu, Na Liu, Yinyin Xie, Shanhe Yu, Hao Yuan, Kai Xue, Jingyi Shi, Ting Xi Liu, Pengfei Xu, Weili Zhao, Yi Zhou, Lan Wang, Qiuhua Huang, Chen Zhu, Sai‐Juan Chen, Xiao-Long Zhou, Xiao‐Jian Sun
Abstract
Abstract The amino acid response (AAR) and unfolded protein response (UPR) pathways converge on eIF2α phosphorylation, which is catalyzed by Gcn2 and Perk, respectively, under different stresses. This close interconnection makes it difficult to specify different functions of AAR and UPR. Here, we generated a zebrafish model in which loss of threonyl-tRNA synthetase (Tars) induces angiogenesis dependent on Tars aminoacylation activity. Comparative transcriptome analysis of the tars -mutant and wild-type embryos with/without Gcn2- or Perk-inhibition reveals that only Gcn2-mediated AAR is activated in the tars -mutants, whereas Perk functions predominantly in normal development. Mechanistic analysis shows that, while a considerable amount of eIF2α is normally phosphorylated by Perk, the loss of Tars causes an accumulation of uncharged tRNA Thr , which in turn activates Gcn2, leading to phosphorylation of an extra amount of eIF2α. The partial switchover of kinases for eIF2α largely overwhelms the functions of Perk in normal development. Interestingly, although inhibition of Gcn2 and Perk in this stress condition both can reduce the eIF2α phosphorylation levels, their functional consequences in the regulation of target genes and in the rescue of the angiogenic phenotypes are dramatically different. Indeed, genetic and pharmacological manipulations of these pathways validate that the Gcn2-mediated AAR, but not the Perk-mediated UPR, is required for tars -deficiency induced angiogenesis. Thus, the interconnected AAR and UPR pathways differentially regulate angiogenesis through selective functions and mutual competitions, reflecting the specificity and efficiency of multiple stress response pathways that evolve integrally to enable an organism to sense/respond precisely to various types of stresses.