Litcius/Paper detail

Clinical standards for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease

Dina Visca, Rosella Centis, Emanuele Pontali, Elisabetta Zampogna, Anne‐Marie Russell, Giovanni Battista Migliori, Claire Andréjak, Miia Aro, Hasan Bayram, K. Berkani, Judith Bruchfeld, Jeremiah Chakaya, J Chorostowska-Wynimko, Bruno Crestani, Margareth Pretti Dalcolmo, Lia D’Ambrosio, Anh Tuan Dinh‐Xuan, Sy Duong‐Quy, Caio Júlio César dos Santos Fernandes, José-María García-García, Alexandre de Melo Kawassaki, Laura Carrozzi, M.a José Martínez-García, Pedro Martins, Mehdi Mirsaeidi, Yousser Mohammad, R N Naidoo, Nuno Neuparth, Lucile Sésé, D. R. Silva, Ivan Solovič, Talant Sooronbaev, Antonio Spanevello, Nicola Sverzellati, Luciana Kase Tanno, Simon Tiberi, Tuula Vasankari, Eirini Vasarmidi, Michele Vitacca, Isabella Annesi‐Maesano

2023The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease15 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on ‘best practice’ care for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease. METHODS: A panel of international experts representing scientific societies, associations and groups active in post-COVID-19 lung disease was identified; 45 completed a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale indicated level of agreement with the draft standards. The final version was approved by consensus (with 100% agreement). RESULTS: Four clinical standards were agreed for patients with a previous history of COVID-19: Standard 1, Patients with sequelae not explained by an alternative diagnosis should be evaluated for possible post-COVID-19 lung disease; Standard 2, Patients with lung function impairment, reduced exercise tolerance, reduced quality of life (QoL) or other relevant signs or ongoing symptoms ≥4 weeks after the onset of first symptoms should be evaluated for treatment and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR); Standard 3, The PR programme should be based on feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness criteria, organised according to local health services and tailored to an individual patient’s needs; and Standard 4, Each patient undergoing and completing PR should be evaluated to determine its effectiveness and have access to a counselling/health education session. CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based set of clinical standards for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease. Our aim is to improve patient care and QoL by guiding clinicians, programme managers and public health officers in planning and implementing a PR programme to manage post-COVID-19 lung disease.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineGold standard (test)Delphi methodQuality of life (healthcare)GuidelinePulmonary rehabilitationPhysical therapyHealth careLikert scaleMEDLINEFamily medicineRehabilitationIntensive care medicineNursingInternal medicinePathologyLawMathematicsPolitical scienceStatisticsEconomicsEconomic growthLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Respiratory Support and MechanismsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders