Litcius/Paper detail

Flutter Analysis with Stabilized Finite Elements based on the Linearized Frequency-domain Approach

Kevin Jacobson, Bret Stanford, Stephen Wood, W. Kyle Anderson

2020AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum20 citationsDOI

Abstract

When designing and certifying aircraft, engineers must take into consideration aeroelastic effects such as flutter. Design and certification of a vehicle may require analysis of thousands of aeroelastic responses. Standard tools in the aerospace industry are based on linear aerody- namic models such as the doublet-lattice method, but these methods can be nonconservative in certain situations such as in the transonic regime. While computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a higher fidelity alternative, the time-marching approach has a drastically increased computational cost compared to the linear aerodynamic methods. By taking advantage of the periodic nature of flutter, frequency-domain methods offer a more efficient alternative to time-marching CFD. In this work, a linearized frequency-domain method is implemented and verified in the stabilized finite-element solver in FUN3D. The linearized frequency-domain method is demonstrated and compared to other methods for traditional benchmark cases for computational aeroelasticity: the AGARD 445.6 wing, the Benchmark Supercritical Wing, and the Benchmark NACA 0012 Wing.

Topics & Concepts

FlutterAeroelasticityAerodynamicsComputational fluid dynamicsTransonicSolverComputer scienceFrequency domainFinite element methodBenchmark (surveying)AirfoilWingAerospaceAerospace engineeringEngineeringStructural engineeringProgramming languageComputer visionGeographyGeodesyVibration and Dynamic AnalysisComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Flutter Analysis with Stabilized Finite Elements based on the Linearized Frequency-domain Approach | Litcius