ECCO consensus on management of inflammatory bowel disease in low- and middle-income countries
Alaa El‐Hussuna, Almuthe Christina Hauer, Tarkan Karakan, Valérie Pittet, Henit Yanai, Jalpa Devi, Jesús K. Yamamoto‐Furusho, Ali Reza Sima, Hailemichael Desalegn, Mutaz Sultan, Vishal Sharma, Hany Shehab, Lamya Mrabti, Natália Sousa Freitas Queiroz, Anuraag Jena, Andy Darma, Karina W. Davidson, Nicolás Avellaneda, Muhammed Elhadi, April Camilla Roslani, Dakshitha Wickramasinghe, Carlo Angelo Cajucom, Shaji Sebastian
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] have increased significantly in low- and middle-income countries [LMICs] in recent decades. Managing IBD in these settings presents substantial challenges. This consensus aims to describe the epidemiology of IBD in LMICs and to highlight the key challenges in its diagnosis and treatment. METHOD: The consensus-defining strategy followed the previous European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] consensus guidelines [available at www.ecco-ibd.eu]. The authors reviewed the available evidence and formulated statements accordingly. Provisional ECCO statements and supporting text were drafted based on a comprehensive literature review and further refined through two voting rounds, which included external reviewers and national representatives from ECCO's 36 member countries. The final ECCO statements, representing a consensus of at least 80% agreement among participants, were approved during an online meeting. Consensus statements should be interpreted in context with their accompanying commentary rather than in isolation and should not be used solely to guide patient management. The supporting text was finalized under the guidance of each working group leader [VP, HY, TK, AH] and subsequently integrated by the consensus leader [AE]. RESULTS: Data on IBD epidemiology in LMICs remain limited. Public and healthcare professional awareness and timely access to early diagnostic modalities, advanced medical and surgical therapies, and specialist multidisciplinary care are key gaps in IBD care in LMICs. The complexity and chronic nature of IBD, along with the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach, pose significant challenges to adopting a holistic management strategy in LMICs. CONCLUSION: There is a critical need for further studies to assess the specific needs of LMICs. Such research will help guide resource allocation and improve IBD management in these settings.