Litcius/Paper detail

Confidence-Calibrated Adversarial Training: Generalizing to Unseen Attacks

David Stutz, Matthias Hein, Bernt Schiele

2020MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)37 citationsOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Adversarial training yields robust models against a specific threat model, e.g., L adversarial examples.Typically robustness does not generalize to previously unseen threat models, e.g., other L p norms, or larger perturbations.Our confidencecalibrated adversarial training (CCAT) tackles this problem by biasing the model towards low confidence predictions on adversarial examples.By allowing to reject examples with low confidence, robustness generalizes beyond the threat model employed during training.CCAT, trained only on L adversarial examples, increases robustness against larger L , L 2 , L 1 and L 0 attacks, adversarial frames, distal adversarial examples and corrupted examples and yields better clean accuracy compared to adversarial training.For thorough evaluation we developed novel white-and black-box attacks directly attacking CCAT by maximizing confidence.For each threat model, we use 7 attacks with up to 50 restarts and 5000 iterations and report worst-case robust test error, extended to our confidence-thresholded setting, across all attacks.

Topics & Concepts

Adversarial systemRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceTraining setArtificial intelligenceLow ConfidenceConfidence intervalThreat modelAlgorithmMachine learningMathematicsStatisticsComputer securityPsychologySocial psychologyBiochemistryChemistryGeneAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Confidence-Calibrated Adversarial Training: Generalizing to Unseen Attacks | Litcius