Litcius/Paper detail

Feasibility and Safety of the Distal Transradial Artery for Coronary Diagnostic or Interventional Catheterization

Yaowang Lin, Xin Sun, Ruimian Chen, Huadong Liu, Xinli Pang, Jie Chen, Shaohong Dong

2020Journal of Interventional Cardiology46 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Background. This prospective study compared the success rate and safety of a distal transradial artery (dTRA) approach to that of the conventional transradial artery (TRA) for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods. From January 2019 to April 2020, nine hundred consecutive patients (height &lt; 190 cm) scheduled for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary interventions were randomly and equally assigned to receive either dTRA or conventional TRA catheterization. Results. Successful access was achieved in 96.00% and 96.67% of the dTRA and conventional TRA groups, respectively ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"><a:mi>P</a:mi><a:mo>=</a:mo><a:mn>0.814</a:mn></a:math> ). Compared with the TRA group, patients in the dTRA experienced significantly less hemostatic band removal time (150.5 ± 50.5 cf. 210.6 ± 60.5 min, <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"><c:mi>P</c:mi><c:mo>=</c:mo><c:mn>0.032</c:mn></c:math> ); minor bleeding of the access site (2.44% cf. 6.44%, <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"><e:mi>P</e:mi><e:mo>=</e:mo><e:mn>0.038</e:mn></e:math> ); hemostatic band cost (USD; 0.1 cf. 59.4, <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"><g:mi>P</g:mi><g:mo>=</g:mo><g:mn>0</g:mn></g:math> ); and postprocedural radial artery occlusion (1.56% cf. 3.78%, <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"><i:mi>P</i:mi><i:mo>=</i:mo><i:mn>0.035</i:mn></i:math> ). A lower body mass index was a higher risk factor for dTRA access failure (odds ratio = 0.79, <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"><k:mi>P</k:mi><k:mo>=</k:mo><k:mn>0.024</k:mn></k:math> ), with a cutoff of 22.04 kg/m2. Conclusion. Compared to conventional TRA, dTRA had a comparable high success rate, with fewer associated complications. Clinicians should use the dTRA with caution in patients with low body mass index.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineCardiac catheterizationCoronary angiographyRadial arteryCardiologyInternal medicineRadiologyArteryMyocardial infarctionVascular Procedures and ComplicationsCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisPeripheral Artery Disease Management