Litcius/Paper detail

Impact of dose reductions on adjuvant abemaciclib efficacy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer: analyses from the monarchE study

Matthew P. Goetz, İrfan Çiçin, Laura Testa, Sara M. Tolaney, Jens Huober, Valentina Guarneri, Stephen Johnston, Miguel Martín, Priya Rastogi, Nadia Harbeck, Ashwin Shahir, Ran Wei, Valérie André, Hope S. Rugo, Joyce O’Shaughnessy

2024npj Breast Cancer35 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

In monarchE, adjuvant abemaciclib significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), with sustained benefit beyond the 2-year treatment period. Abemaciclib dose reductions were allowed to proactively manage adverse events. Exploratory analyses to investigate the impact of dose reductions on efficacy were conducted. Across the three patient subgroups as defined by relative dose intensity (≤66%, 66-93%, ≥93%), the estimated 4-year IDFS rates were generally consistent (87.1%, 86.4%, and 83.7%, respectively). In the time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model, the effect of abemaciclib was consistent at the full dose compared to being reduced to a lower dose (IDFS hazard ratio: 0.905; 95% confidence interval: 0.727, 1.125; DRFS hazard ratio: 0.942; 95% confidence interval: 0.742, 1.195). These analyses showed that the efficacy of adjuvant abemaciclib was not compromised by protocol mandated dose reductions for patients with node positive, hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer.

Topics & Concepts

Hazard ratioMedicineConfidence intervalBreast cancerOncologyInternal medicineProportional hazards modelAdverse effectAdjuvantCancerAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Impact of dose reductions on adjuvant abemaciclib efficacy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer: analyses from the monarchE study | Litcius