Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients with COVID‐19

Abstract

COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first reported in January 2020.1, 2 It has become apparent that coagulopathy is a hallmark of the disease.3, 4 Additionally, thrombotic complications, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), have been reported to occur in 27–69% of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2.5-9 As a result of these reports and other anecdotal evidence, many critically ill patients are receiving empiric therapeutic anti-coagulation. Yet, experts generally recommend against the use of therapeutic anti-coagulation prior to the development of VTE or another clinical indication.4, 10, 11 In order to further our understanding of VTE in COVID-19, we evaluated its prevalence as diagnosed through usual care in patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU). We also sought to determine the association between a diagnosis of VTE and clinical outcomes. We describe the clinical characteristics of our critically ill patients, frequency of VTE diagnosis, and potential clinical and laboratory predictors of a VTE diagnosis. Last, we performed a multivariate analysis to investigate the association between presence of a VTE diagnosis and mortality. We performed a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to an academic medical centre in Colorado. We included adult patients (age ≥18 years old) who received ICU care. The Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board approved the study. Clinical data were abstracted from the electronic health record. Data were last collected on 6 May 2020 for all patients. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse continuous and categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted associations between presence of VTE and mortality. We included key confounders a priori based on clinical importance in the adjusted model including age, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, need for vasopressors, and presence of any co-existing conditions. All data analyses were performed using Stata software version 13.0 (STATACorp, College Station, TX, USA). One-hundred and six patients were admitted to the University of Colorado Hospital in Aurora, CO, between 18 March and 14 April 2020. One patient developed nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection and had been in the hospital since November 2019. A total of 107 patients were evaluated for inclusion. Six patients were excluded as they received therapeutic anti-coagulation for chronic atrial fibrillation (n = 4), chronic VTE (n = 2), or a mechanical heart valve (n = 1). An additional 11 patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy and were analysed separately for VTE presence and excluded from additional analyses. Based upon these exclusions, a total of 91 patients were included in our analyses. VTE was defined by radiographic identification in the routine course of care either by doppler ultrasound of the extremities or computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Twenty-four patients (26·1%) were found to have VTE during their hospitalization. Of these, 21% (n = 5) were found to have a lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 25% (n = 6) an upper-extremity DVT, 33% (n = 8) an internal jugular thrombus, and 21% (n = 5) pulmonary emboli. In patients who required ECMO support, 73% developed VTE. Twenty patients (21·7%) without a documented thrombus received therapeutic anti-coagulation for suspicion of VTE or clinician’s concern for hypercoagulability. Six patients received anti-coagulation for acute onset atrial fibrillation (n = 4) or an elevated troponin level (n = 2). Most patients (54·3%) received therapeutic anti-coagulation during their hospitalization. Characteristics of patients found to have a VTE compared to those without VTE are shown in Table I. Patients without a diagnosis of VTE were more likely to have a co-existing medical condition (81% vs. 58%, P = 0·03). Only three patients had a known underlying malignancy with no known malignancy in the VTE group. Patients with VTE required mechanical ventilation (92% vs. 82%) and vasopressors (79% vs. 63%) more frequently than non-VTE patients, although these differences were not significant. Average creatinine level was higher in those with VTE than those without VTE (2·46 vs. 1·27, P < 0·05). Average hospital length of stay was significantly longer for patients with VTE than those without VTE (26 vs. 16 days, P = 0·001). Other factors known to be associated with VTE including obesity,12 diabetes mellitus,13 and smoking14 were not significantly different between groups. Patient outcomes and results of univariate and multivariate models examining the association between VTE and mortality are shown in Table II. Both groups had comparable rates of extubation, discharge from the ICU, and discharge from the hospital. Patients with VTE were on the ventilator an average of 15 days compared to 11 days for patients without VTE (P = 0·02). Presence of VTE was not significantly associated with mortality in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. Increasing age and the need for vasopressors were independently associated with increased mortality. Our findings indicate a high prevalence of VTE in critically ill patients with COVID-19, which is consistent with previous clinical5-9 and post-mortem reports.15 As all patients were not routinely screened for VTE, it is likely that our findings underestimate the true prevalence of VTE in this patient population. To our knowledge our report is the second-largest investigating this important question. Uniquely, we found that elevated creatinine at time of hospital admission and hospital length of stay were associated with a VTE diagnosis. Patient outcomes were similar for VTE and non-VTE patients in our cohort in contrast to previous reports suggesting worse outcomes amongst patients found to have VTE.6 This discrepancy may have been related to missed diagnoses of VTE in our cohort and/or inclusion of arterial thrombi (i.e. stroke, myocardial infarction, and other systemic arterial thrombi) in the previous report. Further, the small numbers of overall events in our cohort may have limited our inferences. In conclusion, our findings provide further evidence for a high prevalence of VTE in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. These findings are important for identifying a high risk group for adverse outcomes and to raise clinicians’ awareness of VTE risk amongst critically ill COVID-19 patients. We would like to acknowledge all of the front-line workers at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. JAH and SEJ collected and analysed the data. JAH, ELB, and SEJ designed this research study and wrote this manuscript.

Topics & Concepts