Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrasonography Using Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Classification Versus Pathology Findings for Ovarian Cancer
Dania Guadalupe Solis Cano, Hugo Alberto Cervantes Flores, Omar De los Santos Farrera, Nancy Berenice Guzmán Martínez, Danny Soria Céspedes
Abstract
Background One of the limiting factors for early diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms is the lack of standardized terminology for ultrasound. The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) classification aimed to reduce variability between observers and facilitate communication with attending physicians. Recent studies show that O-RADS has higher sensitivity (96.8%) and specificity (92.8%) compared to other classifications. However, to date, there are no reports on O-RADS correlation with pathology findings. Objectives To determine sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound, as a tool for detecting malignant ovarian neoplasms, using the O-RADS compared to pathology reports. Materials and methods We evaluated 73 transvaginal ultrasound records with adnexal masses and applied the O-RADS system. Then, we compared against definitive histopathology diagnosis. We calculated sensitivity and specificity using SPSS. Results O-RADS sensitivity for detection of ovarian cancer was 52%, with a specificity of 84%, negative predictive value of 79%, and positive predictive value of 60%, with an accuracy of 73%. Conclusions In our study, O-RADS classification yielded a higher specificity than sensitivity for malignant vs. benign findings. Hence, we propose that this classification could be useful for tailoring treatment appropriately. O-RADS 0 to 2 may benefit from conservative treatment while O-RADS 3 to 5 may require surgical treatment.