Litcius/Paper detail

Self-Measured Blood Pressure–Guided Pharmacotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of United States-Based Telemedicine Trials

Sameer Acharya, Gagan Neupane, Austin Seals, Madhav KC, Dean Giustini, Sharan Prakash Sharma, Yhenneko J. Taylor, Deepak Palakshappa, Jeff D. Williamson, Justin B. Moore, Hayden B. Bosworth, Yashashwi Pokharel

2024Hypertension24 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to implementing telemedicine hypertension management in the United States is unknown. METHODS: We examined telemedicine hypertension management versus the effect of usual clinic-based care on blood pressure (BP) and patient/clinician-related heterogeneity in a systematic review/meta-analysis. We searched United States-based randomized trials from Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Compendex, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and 2 trial registries. We used trial-level differences in BP and its control rate at ≥6 months using random-effects models. We examined heterogeneity in univariable metaregression and in prespecified subgroups (clinicians leading pharmacotherapy [physician/nonphysician], self-management support [pharmacist/nurse], White versus non-White patient predominant trials [>50% patients/trial], diabetes predominant trials [≥25% patients/trial], and White patient predominant but not diabetes predominant trials versus both non-White and diabetes patient predominant trials]. RESULTS: Thirteen, 11, and 7 trials were eligible for systolic and diastolic BP difference and BP control, respectively. Differences in systolic and diastolic BP and BP control rate were -7.3 mm Hg (95% CI, -9.4 to -5.2), -2.7 mm Hg (-4.0 to -1.5), and 10.1% (0.4%-19.9%), respectively, favoring telemedicine. Greater BP reduction occurred in trials where nonphysicians led pharmacotherapy, pharmacists provided self-management support, White patient predominant trials, and White patient predominant but not diabetes predominant trials, with no difference by diabetes predominant trials. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine hypertension management is more effective than clinic-based care in the United States, particularly when nonphysicians lead pharmacotherapy and pharmacists provide self-management support. Non-White patient predominant trials achieved less BP reduction. Equity-conscious, locally informed adaptation of telemedicine interventions is needed before wider implementation.

Topics & Concepts

MedicinePharmacotherapyBlood pressureMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialCINAHLTelemedicineClinical trialMEDLINEInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusPhysical therapyPsycINFOHealth carePsychological interventionNursingEndocrinologyEconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic growthLawBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Self-Measured Blood Pressure–Guided Pharmacotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of United States-Based Telemedicine Trials | Litcius