Association of Tramadol Versus Codeine Prescriptions with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases among patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched population-based cohort studies
Mansour Bahardoust, Sepideh Mousavi, Maryam Zolfaghari Dehkharghani, Mahsa Arab, Heeva Rashidi, Habib Gorgani, Meisam Haghmoradi, Alireza Askari
Abstract
Abstract Background Today, the prescription of tramadol in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) has increased significantly, which can be associated with serious consequences. Contradictory results have been reported regarding the association of tramadol versus codeine with the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate, for the first time, the association of tramadol versus codeine with the risk of ACM and CVD in OA patients for the first time. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of sciences, and Google Scholar with specific keywords and mesh terms to find relevant studies until January 2024. Two independent researchers did the process of searching and screening articles. Cochran’s Q and I2 tests evaluated the heterogeneity of the studies. Egger’s test was used to evaluate the existence of publication bias. Results Seven population-based cohort studies, matched by the propensity score method, including 1,939,293 participants, were reviewed. The study pooled results did not show a significant association between the prescriptions of tramadol versus codeine with increasing the risk of ACM in OA patients. (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.084, 95% confidence interval (95%) CI: 0.883, 1.286, P: 0.56) In addition, the prescription of tramadol versus codeine was not associated with an increased risk of CVD in OA. (HR: 1.025, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.16, P: 0.68, I 2 = 37.8%) Conclusion Our systematic review showed that tramadol prescription compared to codeine in OA patients was not associated with an increased risk of ACM and CVD.