Litcius/Paper detail

Surgical Treatment of Single Level Cervical Radiculopathy

Kedar Padhye, Paul Shultz, Christopher Alcala, Amir Mehbod, Timothy Garvey, James Schwender, John M. Dawson, Ensor Transfeldt

2022Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication19 citationsDOI

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes, complication rates, and reoperation rates among the 4 treatments in patients with cervical radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical options for cervical radiculopathy include anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), open posterior cervical foraminotomy (O-PCF), minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF), and cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review after Review Board approval. Of the 384 patients in the study-257 ACDF, 18 O-PCF, 52 MI-PCF, and 56 CDA. Information was obtained from the charts and compared between the groups. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients above 18 years of age with single-level, unilateral cervical radiculopathy correlating with magnetic resonance imaging, failure of nonoperative management, and 1-level ACDF, O-PCF, MI-PCF, or CDA with >24 months of follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Score neck and arm pain, minimum clinically significant difference (MCID), complication rates, and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Operative time was significantly shorter for MI-PCF. Median estimated blood loss was small, but greater with O-PCF compared with other interventions. The length of hospital stay was longest for the ACDF group. At 2 years' follow-up, 36 subjects (9%) had subsequent neck surgery. The most common indication for additional surgery was recurrent symptoms (3.4%) followed by adjacent segment disease (2.6%), pseudoarthrosis (2.1%), adjacent segment disease + pseudoarthrosis (0.5%), and implant-related complications (0.3%). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between groups. MCID in NDI was achieved in 40% of MI-PCF subjects, 42% of O-PCF subjects, 66% of CDA subjects and 46% of ACDF subjects. CONCLUSIONS: All 4 treatment options confer good clinical results on patients for cervical radiculopathy. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were low and comparable in all 4 groups. MI-PCF had the shortest surgical time and length of hospital stay. More CDA patients achieved MCID in NDI compared with the others, and the rate for additional surgery at 2 years was lowest in the CDA group.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineSurgeryCervical radiculopathyForaminotomyMinimal clinically important differenceCervical vertebraeSurgical proceduresRetrospective cohort studyMEDLINECervical spinePatient satisfactionSingle CenterReduction (mathematics)Surgical decompressionCervical and Thoracic MyelopathySpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologySpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Surgical Treatment of Single Level Cervical Radiculopathy | Litcius