Litcius/Paper detail

Big Health Data Research and Group Harm: The Scope of IRB Review

Megan Doerr, Sara Meeder

2022Ethics & Human Research37 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Much of precision medicine is driven by big health data research-the analysis of massive datasets representing the complex web of genetic, behavioral, environmental, and other factors that impact human well-being. There are some who point to the Common Rule, the regulation governing federally funded human subjects research, as a regulatory panacea for all types of big health data research. But how well does the Common Rule fit the regulatory needs of this type of research? This article suggests that harms that may arise from artificial intelligence and machine-learning technologies used in big health data research-and the increased likelihood that this research will affect public policy-mean it is time to consider whether the current human research regulations prohibit comprehensive, ethical review of big health data research that may result in group harm.

Topics & Concepts

Big dataHarmPanacea (medicine)Scope (computer science)Common RulePublic healthData sciencePsychologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceMedicineData miningAlternative medicineSocial psychologyInformed consentPathologyNursingProgramming languageEthics in Clinical ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI
Big Health Data Research and Group Harm: The Scope of IRB Review | Litcius