Litcius/Paper detail

BLU-222, an oral, potent, and selective CDK2 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Phase 1 monotherapy dose escalation.

Manish R. Patel, Dejan Juric, Brian S. Henick, Linda Duska, Rentian Wu, Jian Guo, Hui Zhang, Kate J. Newberry, Mikael Rinne, Timothy A. Yap

2023Journal of Clinical Oncology31 citationsDOI

Abstract

3095 Background: Cell growth regulation and proliferation is dependent on cyclins and CDKs. Cyclin E1 ( CCNE1) is a cell cycle regulator that activates CDK2. A broad range of aggressive cancers overexpress cyclin E and/or harbor CCNE1 gene amplifications. Inhibition or loss of CDK2 impairs the growth of CCNE1-amplified cell lines and cyclin E overexpression represents one of several CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance mechanisms, including in hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2–negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer, making CDK2 inhibition a promising novel therapeutic approach. BLU-222 is an investigational, oral, potent, and selective CDK2 inhibitor in early clinical development with best-in-class potential. Methods: VELA (NCT05252416) is an international, open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety, PK, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of BLU-222. In monotherapy dose-escalation, adult patients (pts) enrolled regardless of CCNE1 status, but CCNE1 amplification or progression after a CDK4/6 inhibitor were of specific interest. Pts with ECOG PS 0–2 and confirmed nonresectable tumors who had progressed following standard of care for advanced relapsed/recurrent disease were enrolled. BLU-222 was administered BID in continuous 28-day cycles, with dose escalation employing a Bayesian Optimal Interval design to identify the maximum tolerated dose. Blood samples were collected for PK and circulating biomarker analysis. Results: By Jan 29, 2023, 27 pts were enrolled in 6 escalating BID dose cohorts and included in the safety population. Median age was 64 y (range, 29–85); 85% were female. The most frequent cancer types were breast (44%, 12/27), endometrial (15%, 4/27), ovarian (11%, 3/27), and prostate (11%, 3/27). No pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. The most common (≥15%) AEs (all-cause AE; treatment-related AE) were nausea (33%; 26%), vomiting (22%; 11%), anemia (22%; 19%), diarrhea (22%; 22%), and fatigue (18%; 15%). Transient visual AEs (including blurred vision, photophobia, vision change) were seen in 5 pts (19%). These visual symptoms were mild except in 1 pt with Grade (Gr) 3 blurred vision/photophobia; all had fully resolved by/after the data cut-off. There were 2 dose limiting toxicities reported at the 2 highest dose levels: nausea (Gr 3; n=1) and blurred vision/photophobia (Gr 3; n=1). Translational pharmacodynamic data has shown early evidence of pathway modulation. One partial response was seen in a pt with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer previously treated with 5 lines of therapy, including palbociclib, abemaciclib, and capecitabine. Conclusions: As of the cutoff date, BLU-222 monotherapy was generally well tolerated in pts at the BID doses tested. Dose escalation is ongoing to determine the recommended phase 2 dose. Preliminary evidence of cell cycle pathway modulation and clinical activity have been observed. Clinical trial information: NCT05252416 .

Topics & Concepts

MedicineOncologyInternal medicinePalbociclibPopulationCyclin-dependent kinasePharmacologyCancerBreast cancerCancer researchCell cycleMetastatic breast cancerEnvironmental healthAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies