Litcius/Paper detail

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Víctor M. Montori, Gunn Elisabeth Vist, Regina Kunz, Jan Brożek, Pablo Alonso‐Coello, Ben Djulbegovic, David Atkins, Yngve Falck–Ytter, John W Williams, Joerg J Meerpohl, Susan L. Norris, Elie A. Akl, Holger J. Schünemann

2011Journal of Clinical Epidemiology1,849 citationsDOI

Topics & Concepts

Funnel plotPublication biasObservational studyReporting biasSuspectMedicineMeta-analysisNon-response biasEvidence-based medicineEvidence-based practiceQuality of evidenceRandomized controlled trialQuality (philosophy)Sample size determinationMEDLINEPsychologyStatisticsAlternative medicineLawSurgeryInternal medicinePhilosophyPolitical sciencePathologyMathematicsEpistemologyCriminologyMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias | Litcius