Litcius/Paper detail

Nutritional conditions and PFS and OS in cancer immunotherapy: the MOUSEION-010 meta-analysis

Elsa Vitale, Lorenza Maistrello, Alessandro Rizzo, Oronzo Brunetti, Raffaella Massafra, Veronica Mollica, Francesco Massari, Matteo Santoni

2025Immunotherapy10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Background The MOUSEION-010 Meta-Analysis assessed the association between nutritional status and clinical outcomes such as Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) among cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).Methods Nutritional status was assessed based on the Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) indexes. Databases consulted were: Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science.Results PNI and GNRI indexes did not show a significant association with both PFS and OS, while CONUT index displayed a significant difference in PFS between the two groups, in favor of the control group (Z = 4.04; p < 0.01) also without any publication bias (β= −1.27; 95% CI = [−2.13; −0.42]; p = 0.10]). The same trend was recorded in OS, too (Z = 4.24; p < 0.01). However, publication bias was present (β = 1.89; 95% CI = [1.26; 2.54]; p = 0.028]) and the numerosity of the studies did not reveal the sufficient statistical power to obtain reliable results.Conclusion Malnutrition could negatively impact cancer patients, especially in advanced phases. Our findings could be associated with the reduction of physical ability and daily activity performance, lower compliance with treatment protocols, and shorter survival outcomes.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineMeta-analysisInternal medicineOncologyPublication biasImmunotherapyCancerScopusMEDLINEBiologyBiochemistryNutrition and Health in AgingInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisFrailty in Older Adults
Nutritional conditions and PFS and OS in cancer immunotherapy: the MOUSEION-010 meta-analysis | Litcius