Litcius/Paper detail

Sex disparity in liver allocation within Eurotransplant

Hans de Ferrante, Marieke de Rosner-Van Rosmalen, Bart Smeulders, Serge Vogelaar, Frits Spieksma

2024American Journal of Transplantation14 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

In Eurotransplant, relatively more females than males die while waiting for liver transplantation, and relatively fewer females undergo transplantation. With adult liver transplantation candidates listed between 2007 and 2019 (n = 21 170), we study whether sex disparity is inherent to the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system, or the indirect result of a small candidate body size limiting access to transplantation. Cox proportional hazard models are used to quantify the direct effect of sex on waitlist mortality, independent of the effect of sex through MELD scores, and the direct effect of sex on the transplantation rate, independent of the effect of sex through MELD and candidate body size. Adjusted waitlist mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for female sex are insignificant (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.88-1.20). We thus lack evidence that MELD systematically underestimates waitlist mortality rates for females. Transplantation rates are 25% lower for females than males in unadjusted analyses (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.71-0.77), but HRs become insignificant with adjustment for mediators (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.04), most importantly candidate body size. Sex disparity in Eurotransplant thus appears to be largely a consequence of lower transplantation rates for females, which are explained by sex differences in body size.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineLiver transplantationHazard ratioTransplantationLiver diseaseProportional hazards modelModel for End-Stage Liver DiseaseInternal medicineConfidence intervalLiver Disease and TransplantationOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments