Cystatin C in addition to creatinine for better assessment of glomerular renal function decline in people with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy
Etienne Mondésert, Jacques Reynes, Alain Makinson, Anne‐Sophie Bargnoux, Maëlle Plawecki, David Morquin, Jean‐Paul Cristol, Stéphanie Badiou
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the creatinine equation (eGFRcreat) or the cystatin C equation (eGFRcys) in people with HIV (PWH) under antiretroviral drugs. We specifically included patients with an eGFRcreat around 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 to evaluate agreement on stage 2 and 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification. DESIGN: eGFRcreat, eGFRcys and resulting CKD staging were determined in 262 consecutive patients with HIV-1 (PWH) with a suppressed viral load (<200 copies/ml) under antiretroviral drugs and having impaired renal function (eGFRcreat between 45 and 80 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Antiretroviral drugs regimens were classified into eight groups: cobicistat (COBI)+elvitegravir (EVG), ritonavir (RTV)+protease inhibitor, dolutegravir (DTG), DTG+rilpivirine (RPV), RPV, raltegravir (RAL), bictegravir (BIC), and other antiretroviral drugs. RESULTS: Mean eGFRcys was higher than mean eGFRcreat (77.7 ± 0.5 vs. 67.9 ± 7.9 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P < 0.0001). The differences were significant in five treatment groups with COBI/EVG; DTG; DTG+RPV; RPV; RAL. CKD classification was modified for 51% of patients when using eGFRcys instead of eGFRcreat, with reclassification to less severe stages in 37% and worse stages in 14%. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted significant differences in eGFR depending on the renal marker used in PWH, having a significant impact on CKD classification. eGFRcys should be an additive tool for patients having eGFRcreat around 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for better identification of renal impairment.