Towards Unified Metrics for Accuracy and Diversity for Recommender Systems
Javier Parapar, Filip Radlinski
Abstract
Recommender systems evaluation has evolved rapidly in recent years. However, for offline evaluation, accuracy is the de facto standard for assessing the superiority of one method over another, with most research comparisons focused on tasks ranging from rating prediction to ranking metrics for top-n recommendation. Simultaneously, recommendation diversity and novelty have become recognized as critical to users’ perceived utility, with several new metrics recently proposed for evaluating these aspects of recommendation lists. Consequently, the accuracy-diversity dilemma frequently shows up as a choice to make when creating new recommendation algorithms.
Topics & Concepts
Recommender systemComputer scienceNoveltyRanking (information retrieval)De factoDiversity (politics)DilemmaInformation retrievalMachine learningData miningArtificial intelligenceData sciencePolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophyAnthropologySociologyEpistemologyLawRecommender Systems and TechniquesAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing