Litcius/Paper detail

Is exhaled carbon dioxide an appropriate tracer for assessing airborne transmission risk?

Ruth Onkangi, Kazuki Kuga, Kazuhide Ito

2025Building and Environment6 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Understanding the inhalation exposure to exhaled carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and respiratory droplets in close-contact interactions is critical for assessing airborne infection risks in indoor environments. This study presents a numerical analysis comparing the spatiotemporal transport and inhalation of exhaled CO 2 (modeled as a passive scalar) and virus-laden droplets (modeled using a Lagrangian discrete phase model) under various interpersonal distances, body postures, and respiratory activities (namely speaking and coughing). The results showed that although fine droplets (<5 μm) exhibit similar dispersion patterns to CO 2 owing to their aerodynamic behavior, larger droplets deviate significantly because of gravitational and inertial forces. The arrival time and inhalation amount of CO 2 were often earlier and higher, respectively, than those of the droplets, particularly in speaking scenarios. However, in coughing cases, the rapid dilution of the exhaled CO 2 jet led to an underestimation of droplet exposure. Furthermore, exhaled CO 2 did not account for dermal and nasal deposition, particularly for larger droplets. These findings highlight that CO 2 can serve as a useful tracer for visualizing airflow and aerosol-like behavior but not as a reliable proxy for droplet transmission risk. Collectively, accurate risk assessment requires the integration of particle-specific dynamics, evaporation, and realistic emission profiles.

Topics & Concepts

TRACERCarbon dioxideEnvironmental scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Exhaled breath condensateEnvironmental chemistryEngineeringChemistryMedicineTelecommunicationsPhysicsInternal medicineNuclear physicsAsthmaOrganic chemistryInfection Control and VentilationNoise Effects and ManagementInfection Control in Healthcare