Litcius/Paper detail

Screening of psychiatric disorders in women with high‐risk pregnancy: Accuracy of three psychological tools

Angela Hamidia, Farzan Kheirkhah, Mohammad Chehrazi, Zahra Basirat, Reza Ghadimi, Shahnaz Barat, Pim Cuijpers, Elizabeth O’Connor, Seyyedeh Mahboubeh Mirtabar, Mahbobeh Faramarzi

2022Health Science Reports23 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated the optimal cutoff points of three psychological tools for screening psychiatric disorders in women with high-risk pregnancy. DESIGN AND METHODS: ensitivity/specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Brief Symptom Inventory 53-items (BSI-53), and the BSI-18 were computed with respect to having a psychiatric diagnosis based on the clinical interview. RESULTS: The usual cutoffs (≥13 for EPDS, T-score of 63 for BSI-53) demonstrated poor diagnostic accuracy. The optimal thresholds were computed for EPDS cutoff of 6.5, GSI = 0.47 for BSI-53, and GSI = 0.5 for BSI-18. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The use of psychological tools among pregnant women with high-risk pregnancy may need to be modified in order to accurately identify psychiatric disorders.

Topics & Concepts

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression ScalePsychiatryPregnancyDepression (economics)MedicineCutoffPsychiatric diagnosisPsychiatric assessmentHigh risk pregnancyObstetricsClinical psychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Depressive symptomsAnxietyPhysicsGeneticsQuantum mechanicsMacroeconomicsEconomicsBiologyMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and AccessSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Screening of psychiatric disorders in women with high‐risk pregnancy: Accuracy of three psychological tools | Litcius