Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Pediatric Temporal Bone CT Using Photon-Counting Detector CT and Energy-Integrating Detector CT
Jeong Sub Lee, John Kim, Jayapalli Rajiv Bapuraj, Ashok Srinivasan
Abstract
<h3>ABSTRACT</h3> <h3>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:</h3> To compare the image quality and radiation dose of temporal bone CT scans in pediatric patients acquired with photon counting detectors (PCD) CT and energy integrating detectors (EID) CT. <h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</h3> The retrospective study included a total of 110 pediatric temporal bone CT scans (PCD-CT, n=52; EIDCT, n=58). Two independent readers evaluated the spatial resolution of 4 anatomical structures (tympanic membrane, incudostapedial joint, stapedial crura, and cochlear modiolus) and overall image quality using a 4-point scale. Inter-reader agreement was assessed. Dose length product (DLP) for each CT was compared, and subgroup analyses were performed based on age (under 3 years, 3-5 years, 6-11 years, and 12 years and above). <h3>RESULTS:</h3> PCD-CT demonstrated statistically significantly higher scores than EID-CT for all items (tympanic membrane, 2.9 vs. 2.4; incudostapedial joint, 3.6 vs. 2.6, stapedial crura, 3.2 vs. 2.4; cochlear modiolus, 3.4 vs. 2.8; overall image quality, 3.6 vs. 2.8; p<0.05). Inter-reader agreement ranged from good to excellent (ICCs, 0.6-0.81). PCD-CT exhibited a 43% dose reduction compared to EID-CT, with a particularly substantial reduction of over 70% in the subgroups of children under 6 years. <h3>CONCLUSIONS:</h3> PCD temporal bone CT achieves significantly superior imaging quality at a lower radiation dose compared to EID-CT. ABBREVIATIONS: PCD-CT = photon counting detectors CT; EID-CT = energy integrating detectors CT; DLP = dose length product; AEC = automatic exposure control; ICC = interclass correlation coefficient.