Litcius/Paper detail

WHO Knew. How the World Health Organization (WHO) Became a Dangerous Interloper on Workplace Health and Safety and COVID-19

Rory O’Neill

2020NEW SOLUTIONS A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy16 citationsDOI

Abstract

The World Health Organization's (WHO) workplace health and safety guidelines on COVID-19 are unacceptably complacent in parts, patently dangerous in others, and contain serious gaps. Omissions include no mention of the essential role of labor inspection and enforcement, and a lack of recognition of potential interactions with other workplace hazards. WHO also omitted discussion of the necessity for wider employment protections to make safety and safe behavior a realistic prospect. Potential risks in outdoor work and the need to address the impact of job segregation related to inequalities in health outcomes are also absent. WHO's advice influences national practice, official guidance, and binding rules.The International Trade Union Confederation has assessed the flaws in WHO's arguments and has prepared a critique so they are understood and can be challenged.

Topics & Concepts

EnforcementWork (physics)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Occupational safety and healthPublic relationsBusiness2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPolitical sciencePsychologyMedicineLawEngineeringVirologyPathologyOutbreakMechanical engineeringInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseInfection Control and VentilationClimate Change and Health ImpactsCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
WHO Knew. How the World Health Organization (WHO) Became a Dangerous Interloper on Workplace Health and Safety and COVID-19 | Litcius