Utilitarianism for animals, Kantianism for people? Harming animals and humans for the greater good.
Lucius Caviola, Guy Kahane, Jim A. C. Everett, elliot teperman, Julian Savulescu, Nadira S. Faber
Abstract
-the tendency to ascribe lower moral value to animals due to their species-membership alone. In sum, our studies show that deontological constraints against instrumental harm are not absolute but get weaker the less people morally value the respective entity. These constraints are strongest for humans, followed by dogs, chimpanzees, pigs, and finally inanimate objects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Topics & Concepts
UtilitarianismPsychologySocial psychologyPositive economicsCognitive psychologyEpistemologyEconomicsPhilosophyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion