Litcius/Paper detail

COMPARISON OF UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION METHODS FOR CNN-BASED REGRESSION

K. Wursthorn, Markus Hillemann, Markus Ulrich

2022˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract. The evaluation of reliability is not only of high importance for safety-critical deep learning applications but for object pose estimation as well. The uncertainty of the result is one way to express its reliability. In order to better understand existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods and their performance on image-based regression tasks, we use a small CNN and various scenarios to evaluate the estimated uncertainties. The evaluation is done on different simplistic synthetic datasets, consisting of gray-scale images of squares on a darker background. We train the CNN to predict the square center position of the square in the image. We compare how different UQ methods perform under dataset shift, rotation, occlusion, noise changes in the images.

Topics & Concepts

Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceReliability (semiconductor)RegressionUncertainty quantificationImage (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Rotation (mathematics)Noise (video)Machine learningData miningStatisticsMathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsPower (physics)Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications
COMPARISON OF UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION METHODS FOR CNN-BASED REGRESSION | Litcius